Thursday, May 29, 2025

Liberals Embrace Islamic Extremism in CanadaNew Foto - Liberals Embrace Islamic Extremism in Canada

When FBI director Kash Patel condemned Canada allowing Islamic terrorists to gain a foothold in North America, Canadian politicians and pundits, including new Prime MinisterMark Carney, dismissed Patels assertions as baseless fearmongering. Unfortunately, it is clear that the Trump administration is correct: Radical Islamic ideology has become endemic in Canada over the past decade. The Canadian Security Intelligence Service itself has confirmed that, since 2015, radical Islamic ideology has become commonplace throughout Canadian society, as a result of the porous borders and the Liberal governments unwillingness to effectively regulate the influx of international migration intoCanada. Numerous terrorist leaders and those with intimate connections to terrorist organizations such as Samidoun and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine have been permitted to migrate within the Canadian state and promote their own nihilistic ideology over the pastdecade. Islamic schools in Canada are not compelled to abide by a standardizedcurriculumand, consequently, covertly promote radical Islamic ideology and extremism to vulnerable children inCanada. At one prominent Islamic school in Canada, the East End Madrassah, administrators were recently pressured to issue a public apology after it was exposed for "… teaching children that treacherous Jews conspired to kill the Islamic ProphetMohammed." Since 2015, explicit Islamic terrorist acts have become increasingly prevalent inCanada. According to data from the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, "[N]early a dozen terrorism-related incidents [have occurred] in Canada or abroad involvingCanadians" since Oct. 7, 2023, alone. In addition), "The number of terrorism charges laid in Canada jumped 488% lastyear" and "Canadian police have foiled six terrorist plots in the last 12 months alone, with arrests spanning from Edmonton to Ottawa toToronto." The Liberal government recently publicly downplayed a report from the United Kingdoms Foreign, Commonwealth, & Development Office that a "terror attack attempt in Canada is verylikely." The globally renowned Counter Extremism Project has recently reported that "within the past few decades, several hundred Canadian civilians have been killed or injured in incidents related to violentextremism," and that, in spite of the glib posturing and "apparent policy shifts in the Trudeau government, Canada has historically viewed violent Islamist extremism as one of the leading threats to its nationalsecurity." In addition, the Integrated Terrorism Assessment Centre recently warned the Canadian government that Canada will likely "experience a lone-wolf terror attack soon ... and antisemitism is overwhelmingly the motivatingfactor." And to Kash Patels point, over the past decade Canadas porous borders and the Liberal governments tolerance of Islamic extremism have functioned in concert to enable various terrorists to transgress from Canada into America to commit crimes and even mass murder. In 2024, Muhammad Shahzeb Khan, a longtime resident of Canada, attempted to carry out a mass shooting in support of ISIS in New YorkCity, and Shamsud-Din Jabbar, the ISIS terrorist who committed the horrific "Bourbon Street Attack" in New Orleans, was also previously permitted to travel freely between Canada and theU.S. Furthermore, the Canadian Security Intelligence Service itself has long recognized Canadas modern transformation into an exporter of Islamic terrorism and for years has attempted to "monitor and respond to the threat of Canadian extremist travellers(CETs)." According to Director Patel and the FBI, "over 300 known or suspected terrorists crossed into this country last year illegally … 85% of them came through [Canada and] the northernborder," and "This year, 100 known or suspected terrorists have crossed into this country illegally, 64 or so from thenorth." Even Justin Trudeau, Canadas previous prime minister, was recently forced to admit that "bad actors … have been exploiting [Canadas] immigration system for their owninterests." Despite all this, the Canadian political establishment and the media have stubbornly denied any suggestion that Islamic extremism has successfully entrenched itself within Canada. More importantly, it is readily apparent that until the Liberal government starts to earnestly secure Canadas borders and begins to excise Islamic extremism from within Canadian society, Canada will continue to serve as a womb for Islamic extremism in North America and a constant source of terrorism in the U.S. William Barclay is a political theorist and private consultant. His work has been published by the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, Palgrave-Macmillan, The Hill Times, and the Journal of Liberty and International Affairs, among others. Follow him on Twitter/X @WillBarclayBBC.

Liberals Embrace Islamic Extremism in Canada

Liberals Embrace Islamic Extremism in Canada When FBI director Kash Patel condemned Canada allowing Islamic terrorists to gain a foothold in...
The Five Small Businesses That Helped Block Trump's TariffsNew Foto - The Five Small Businesses That Helped Block Trump's Tariffs

President Donald Trump speaks in the Oval Office of the White House on March 31, 2025, in Washington, D.C. Credit - Andrew Harnik—Getty Images The federal Court of International Tradehas blocked President Donald Trump's sweeping global tariffs, arguing that emergency laws invoked by the Administration did not give Trump unilateral authority to impose the levies. Per the court,the U.S. Constitutiongives Congress exclusive powers to regulate trade with other countries, something which Trump cannot supersede. Trump announced most of his tariffs—the ones he calls "reciprocal"— on April 2, his self-appointed "Liberation Day." A baseline rate of 10% was placed on U.S. imports, while additional "reciprocal" tariffs were doled out on top of those. Trump thenannounced a 90-day pause on the additional tariffsfor most countries, allowing time for negotiations. The U.S. and China later came to a separate agreement, agreeing in May tosignificantly reduce tariffs on each otherfor a 90-day period. The Court of International Trade's May 28 ruling is based on two separate cases. One lawsuit was filed by a coalition of 12 state governments on April 24, led by Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield."The court's ruling is a victory not just for Oregon, but for working families, small businesses, and everyday Americans. President Trump's sweeping tariffs were unlawful, reckless, and economically devastating. They triggered retaliatory measures, inflated prices on essential goods, and placed an unfair burden on American families, small businesses and manufacturers," said Rayfield,reacting to the court victory."We brought this case because the Constitution doesn't give any president unchecked authority to upend the economy. This ruling reaffirms that our laws matter, and that trade decisions can't be made on the President's whim." The other lawsuit was filed by the nonpartisan Liberty Justice Center on April 14, representing five small businesses facing the "devastating" impact of such tariffs. TheLiberty Justice Center arguedthat the Trump Administration could not "issue across-the-board worldwide tariffs without congressional approval." The counsel said that the five owner-operated businesses it filed on behalf of had all been "severely harmed by the tariffs," highlighting "the human and economic toll of unchecked executive power." Responding to the May 28 court victory,Jeffrey Schwab, senior counsel and director of litigation at the Liberty Justice Center, said: "This ruling reaffirms that the President must act within the bounds of the law, and it protects American businesses and consumers from the destabilizing effects of volatile, unilaterally imposed tariffs." Co-counsel Ilya Somin added: ""It's great to see that the court unanimously ruled against this massive power grab by the President. The ruling emphasizes that he was wrong to claim a virtually unlimited power to impose tariffs, that IEEPA (International Emergency Economic Powers Act) law doesn't grant any such boundless authority, and that it would be unconstitutional if it did." The New York-based wine company said that Trump's tariffs: "threaten to unravel everything VOS has spent a generation building." The company, which has been running for almost 40 years, said that its expertise in wine and spirits is something that "cannot be replicated," in the U.S., pushing back against Trump's often repeated statement that if products are made in the U.S., they won't be subjected to tariffs.The company highlighted four main issues that have arisen as a result of Trump's tariffs threats. VOS said that buyers have been holding off on orders due to uncertainty, amid Trump's back-and-forth decision making regarding levies and deadlines. The small business also flagged how its cash flow is under "immediate strain," even if costs are eventually passed onto customers. Additionally, VOS said it cannot gamble on unknown prices months in advance and that the knock on-effects, such as reduced purchasing capacity and smaller cash flow, from partners have also hit the business hard. Based near Lake Erie in Pennsylvania, wholesale and retailer of fishing tackle and apparel FishUSA said that it is "reeling from the tariffs." In a statement issued prior to the court ruling, the companysaid: "We're a Pennsylvania business employing dozens of hardworking Americans, trying to compete in a global market. These tariffs make it nearly impossible to plan, price, or grow." The retailer added that it has been particularly impacted by tariffs imposed on Asian countries, from which it imports many of its manufactured fishing goods. Suppliers have already preemptively raised prices in anticipation, and FishUSA says that switching to U.S.-based production could take years to fully enact. David Levi runs the business out of a workshop in Charlottesville, Virginia. The company designs small electronic kits aimed at teaching children how to build simple devices and gadgets. Its most popular product instructs children how to assemble a musical instrument from scratch. In a statement published by the Liberty Justice Center, Levi likened Trump's tariffs to a "death sentence." Much like other businesses, Levi has found the uncertainty and back-and-forth nature of Trump's tariffs to be a major stumbling block when it comes to completing orders."I could place an order for parts today, and by the time it arrives, the tariff might have doubled," Levi said. "I can't plan. I can't budget. I can't grow." A small business, Terry Precision Cycling focuses solely on women's cycling, the first company to do so, according to its founder, Nik Holm. But Trump's tariffs were described by Holm as the "single greatest threat," that his company has faced in its 40 years of operations. In a statement,Holm said: "They're indiscriminate, unmanageable, and totally disconnected from economic reality." Holm said his company joining the lawsuit not just about the economic impact, but "about defending the right to build and run a business without getting crushed by unpredictable government overreach." At its Washington State factory, Genova Pipe manufactures ABS pipe, importing crucial resin materials from South Korea and Taiwan. Most of the company's product is then exported to Canada. Genova Pipe has an additional six factories across the U.S. After joining the lawsuit,Andrew Reese, the president of the company, said in a statement: "The newly-imposed tariffs are increasing our raw material costs and hindering our ability to compete in the export market." Reese said that over 75% of the company's resin material imports are sourced from Asia, and that replacing these suppliers with U.S.-based manufacturers was not a feasible option. With most of his customers in Canada, Reese has major concerns that buyers will opt for local, cheaper manufacturers if tariffs force Genova Pipe to inevitably raise its prices. Contact usatletters@time.com.

The Five Small Businesses That Helped Block Trump's Tariffs

The Five Small Businesses That Helped Block Trump's Tariffs President Donald Trump speaks in the Oval Office of the White House on March...
6 soldiers killed, 2 wounded by bomb explosion in cartel bastionNew Foto - 6 soldiers killed, 2 wounded by bomb explosion in cartel bastion

An explosive device killed six soldiers and wounded two others in a western Mexican region wracked bydrug cartel violence, an official military report seen by AFP on Wednesday said. The blast late Tuesday near a town in Michoacan state destroyed the armored vehicle in which the troops were traveling, according to the internal document. Military planes and helicopters were deployed to help the casualties, it said. President Claudia Sheinbaum described the deaths as "deplorable" and expressed solidarity with the victims. Warring criminals in the region have a history of planting improvised landmines and attacking security forces withexplosive-laden drones. Several soldiers have been killed in similar explosions in the past. Criminal violence, most of it linked to drug trafficking, has claimed around 480,000 lives in Mexico since 2006 and left more than 120,000 people missing. U.S. President Donald Trump hasdesignatedsix Mexican drug trafficking groups terrorist organizations, fueling speculation that he might order military strikes against them. Michoacan, where the deadly bombing took place, has been plagued by violence as a turf war rages between the influentialJalisco New Generation drug carteland local criminal groups. Last month, gunmen seized cargo trucks andset them on fireon a highway connecting Mexico City to Guadalajara, before police reported at least 18 similar cases in the neighboring states of Michoacan and Guanajuato. A Michoacan police source told AFP on condition of anonymity that the attacks were a reaction by Jalisco New Generation to a military operation in the area. Last August, Michoacan's chief prosecutor confirmed that gunmen linked to drug cartelsshot to deathseven members of the community police force in the town of Coahuayana. The influence of cartels has also infiltrated communities in the area. In December, a sign in a town in Michoacan was posted thanking a cartel leader — who has a$15 million bountyon his head in the U.S. — for holiday season presents for children. The message at a Christmas fair thankedJalisco cartelleader Nemesio Oseguera — better known by his nickname"El Mencho"— for the gifts. SpaceX loses contact with its Starship, spins out of control Videos show man assaulting TSA agents, passenger at Miami International Airport 4-year-old girl fighting for her life at California hospital faces deportation order

6 soldiers killed, 2 wounded by bomb explosion in cartel bastion

6 soldiers killed, 2 wounded by bomb explosion in cartel bastion An explosive device killed six soldiers and wounded two others in a western...
US ruling that Trump tariffs are unlawful stirs relief and uncertaintyNew Foto - US ruling that Trump tariffs are unlawful stirs relief and uncertainty

By Samuel Indyk and Sarah Marsh (Reuters) -A U.S. trade court ruling that blocked most of President Donald Trump's tariffs and found he had overstepped his authority triggered some relief on financial markets on Thursday, while adding to the uncertainties weighing on the global economy. Among the United States' big trading partners, in the throes of negotiation with the Trump administration, Germany said it could not comment, as did the European Commission. "We ask for your understanding that we cannot comment on the legal proceedings in the U.S., as they are still ongoing," a spokesperson for Germany's economy ministry said. "We continue to hope that a mutually beneficial solution can be reached in the negotiations between the EU Commission and the U.S. government." Winners on financial markets included chip makers, banks, luxury stocks and auto industry, all hit hard by tariff-led disruptions. The U.S. dollar rallied 0.2% against the yen and 0.3% against the Swiss franc as currencies and assets that have benefited from the tariff-induced market turmoil fell. Wall Street stock index futures rose by more than 1.5% The trade court ruling on Wednesday dealt a blow to Trump's central policy of using tariffs to wring concessions from trading partners. His administration immediately said it will appeal and analysts said investors will remain cautious as the White House explores its legal avenues. Following a market revolt after Trump's major tariff announcement on April 2, the U.S. president paused most import duties for 90 days and said he would hammer out bilateral deals with trade partners. But apart from a pact with Britain this month, agreements remain elusive and the court's stay on the tariffs may dissuade countries like Japan from rushing into deals, analysts said. Another pause in Trump's stop-start trade policy could be helpful to opponents of his tariffs and to traders who relish volatility. "Assuming that an appeal does not succeed in the next few days, the main win is time to prepare, and also a cap on the breadth of tariffs – which can't exceed 15% for the time being," George Lagarias, chief economist at Forvis Mazars international advisers, said. TURMOIL Trump's trade war has shaken makers of everything from luxury handbags and trainers to household appliances and cars as the price of raw materials has risen, supply chains have been disrupted and company strategies redrafted. Drinks company Diageo, automakers General Motors and Ford are among those who have abandoned forecasts for the year ahead. Non-U.S. companies including Honda, Campari and pharmaceutical companies Roche and Novartis have said they are considering moving operations or expanding their U.S. presence to mitigate the impact of tariffs. As markets assessed the latest twist in the trade upheaval, European export-sensitive sectors, such as autos and luxury stocks, were among leading gainers on Thursday. The pan-continental STOXX 600 was up 0.4%, while France's CAC 40, which has a heavy weighting of luxury and bank stocks, rose 0.8%. Overall sentiment was also lifted by strong results late on Wednesday from AI bellwether Nvidia. Spot gold declined for a fourth straight day, while U.S. Treasury yields rose. Bond yields move inversely with prices. But the gains in shares may be short-lived, analysts said, with those who relish risk making the most of them. "I think we are in a period of higher volatility - we will get some more spikes on the way, I think. But volatility is the friend of the active investors," Kevin Barker, global head of active equities, UBS Asset Management, told a media briefing. (Reporting by Summer Zhen, Samuel Indyk and Sarah Marsh; Writing by Barbara Lewis; Editing by Catherine Evans)

US ruling that Trump tariffs are unlawful stirs relief and uncertainty

US ruling that Trump tariffs are unlawful stirs relief and uncertainty By Samuel Indyk and Sarah Marsh (Reuters) -A U.S. trade court ruling ...
In riposte to Vance, Germany's Merz says Europe stands for freedomNew Foto - In riposte to Vance, Germany's Merz says Europe stands for freedom

By Sarah Marsh and Matthias Williams BERLIN (Reuters) -German Chancellor Friedrich Merz on Thursday said Europe was prepared to fight if necessary for its core values of freedom and democracy, in an explicit riposte to the Trump administration's repeated criticisms of the European Union. Speaking at a ceremony to award European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen the Charlemagne Prize, Merz also repeated that Europe did not want an escalation in its tariff dispute with the United States that harmed both sides. He recalled a speech by U.S. Vice President JD Vance in Munich in February, in which Vance made a blistering attack on Europe, saying it faced a "threat from within" and that free speech was "in retreat". Merz's remarks come a day after the U.S. said it would impose visa bans on foreign nationals it deems to be censoring Americans, which could include officials regulating U.S. tech companies. No specific targets were named, but U.S. tech companies and the Trump administration have challenged U.S. allies in Europe, alleging censorship of social media platforms. "U.S. Vice President JD Vance confronted us with this question in his own way in Munich at the beginning of the year: What is it that we Europeans defend together? What is it that we stand for together?" Merz said. "Ladies and gentlemen, we don't have just any answer to that. We have the strongest and best answer imaginable," he said. "It is: We in Europe stand for what we – over centuries, through countless setbacks and catastrophes – what we have conceived, developed, achieved, and fought for together: namely, the conviction that freedom and democracy are worth standing up for resolutely and, if necessary, fighting to preserve them." Merz, a conservative who took office this year vowing to make the German army the strongest conventional force in Europe, said Germany would not stand on the sidelines to strengthen Europe, and hailed "a new spirit of unity" among Europeans. He cited support for Ukraine and a trade and defence reset with Britain earlier this month. (Writing by Matthias WilliamsEditing by Ros Russell)

In riposte to Vance, Germany's Merz says Europe stands for freedom

In riposte to Vance, Germany's Merz says Europe stands for freedom By Sarah Marsh and Matthias Williams BERLIN (Reuters) -German Chancel...

 

ISG POLITICS © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com