Wednesday, May 28, 2025

Food trucks in Gaza raided, underscoring aid distribution problemsNew Foto - Food trucks in Gaza raided, underscoring aid distribution problems

By Nidal al-Mughrabi and James Mackenzie CAIRO/JERUSALEM (Reuters) -U.N. trucks delivering food to Gaza were stopped and looted overnight, Gaza residents and merchants said on Wednesday, hours after desperate Palestinians overran a distribution site run by a U.S.-backed group trying to start delivering aid. The incidents underscore the problems getting supplies to hundreds of thousands of Palestinians facing worsening hunger and starvation after a weeks-long Israeli blockade. On Tuesday, Israeli troops fired warning shots as crowds rushed to a distribution point run by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, a U.S.-backed group that began supplying aid under a new system which Israel hopes will prevent aid reaching Hamas. The United Nations and other international aid groups have refused to take part, saying the scheme violates the principle that aid should be distributed neutrally, based only on need. As the new system began, the Israeli military also allowed 95 trucks belonging to the U.N. and other aid groups into the enclave, but three Gaza residents and three merchants said a number of trucks were targeted by looters. One Palestinian transport operator said at least 20 trucks belonging to the U.N. World Food Programme were attacked shortly before midnight. "Some trucks made it through, then it seems that people became aware of that," one witness told Reuters via a chat app, declining to be named because of the sensitivity of the issue. "They woke up, some placed barriers on the road intercepted and stole the goods." Israeli forces, which resumed their operation in Gaza in March following a brief truce, continued strikes on Wednesday, killing at least 15 people including eight members of the family of a local journalist, Palestinian health officials said. SCREENING To qualify for aid under the new system, people seeking food are supposed to undergo screening to ensure they are not linked to Hamas, a measure that has heightened Palestinian suspicion of the operation. But witnesses on Tuesday said that no effective identification process seemed to be in place. "What we saw yesterday was a very clear example of the dangers of distributing food," said Ajith Sunghay, Head of the U.N. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. "We are exposing people to death and injury," he told reporters in Geneva, adding that 47 people had been wounded by gunfire as the chaos unfolded. Footage shared on social media showed fences broken down by crowds trying to reach crates of supplies as private security contractors operating the site fell back. "I am a big man, but I couldn't hold back my tears when I saw the images of women, men, and children racing for some food," said Rabah Rezik, 65, a father of seven from Gaza City. Israel imposed the blockade on aid supplies in March, accusing Hamas of seizing supplies meant for civilians, a charge Hamas denies. U.N. officials say they have seen no evidence that the militant group has been looting trucks since Israel eased the blockade this month under mounting international pressure. However, Hamas has told people in Gaza not to go to the four distribution points in southern Gaza set up for the new system. It denied accusations from Israel that it was blocking access to the sites. INCREASING PRESSURE The U.S. ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, called it "sad and disgusting" that the United Nations and other groups were not taking part in the new system to distribute aid. "There were lines of people that got food which was not stolen by Hamas. The manner in which it was distributed is effective so far," he told Reuters. Israel has faced increasing pressure over the dire humanitarian situation in Gaza, even from countries long reluctant to voice strong criticism. France, Britain and Germany have said they may take action if the military campaign is not halted. On Wednesday, Italy also said the offensive had become unacceptable and must stop immediately. Israel launched its campaign in Gaza in retaliation for the Hamas-led attack on communities in southern Israel on October 7, 2023 that killed some 1,200 people and saw 251 hostages abducted into Gaza. Its assault has killed more than 54,000 Palestinians and reduced much of the crowded coastal enclave to rubble, with the population of more than 2 million now squeezed into narrow areas on the coast and around the southern city of Khan Younis. (Additional reporting by Olivia Le Poidevin in Geneva and Steven Scheer in Jerusalem; Writing by James Mackenzie; Editing by Aidan Lewis)

Food trucks in Gaza raided, underscoring aid distribution problems

Food trucks in Gaza raided, underscoring aid distribution problems By Nidal al-Mughrabi and James Mackenzie CAIRO/JERUSALEM (Reuters) -U.N....
Trump administration sues North Carolina election officials over thousands of voter registrationsNew Foto - Trump administration sues North Carolina election officials over thousands of voter registrations

The Justice Department filed a lawsuit Tuesday against North Carolina election officials targeting the registration records of potentially hundreds of thousands of registered voters in the state. The new lawsuit alleges the North Carolina State Board of Elections violated the Help America Vote Act by failing to collect and record voters' driver's license numbers or the last four digits of their Social Security numbers. It pivots off of an argument made by a GOP state Supreme Court candidate whotried unsuccessfullyto overturn his defeat to a Democratic incumbent. The Trump administration is asking for a court order that would require election officials to contact the registered voters in North Carolina who, according to the lawsuit, lack that information in their registration records. The lawsuit says a "significant number" of registered voters lack the information, and it references an earlier administrative complaint with the board that estimated the number to be more than 200,000 registered voters. In a statement, board Executive Director Sam Hayes said that he only recently became aware of the lawsuit but that the "failure to collect the information required by HAVA has been well documented." "Rest assured that I am committed to bringing North Carolina into compliance with federal law," Hayes said. The new lawsuit follows through on priorities for President Donald Trump's second-term Justice Department, which administration officials have said would focus on cleaning voting rolls and rooting out election fraud. Several voting rights lawsuits brought by the prior administration have been dismissed by the new leadership. The head of the department's Civil Rights Division, Harmeet Dhillon, has made comments welcoming a mass exodus of career DOJ attorneys, describing them as being unwilling to execute the agenda of the president whom Americans put in the office. There is no evidence of widespread voter fraud in US elections. The lawsuit references an election rules overhaul Trump is trying to implement nationwide through an executive order. "The cornerstone of public trust in government lies in free and fair elections. The core of the compact between a state and its citizens rests in ensuring that only eligible citizens can vote in elections," the complaint says. With the new case, the department is following up on legal claims made by Judge Jefferson Griffin, who lost last year by 734 votes to state Supreme Court Justice Allison Riggs. Griffin argued that the ballots of some 60,000 voters who lacked the ID numbers in their registration records should be thrown out, an argument that the Republican-leaning North Carolina Supreme Court rejected. In its ruling, the state Supreme Court noted Griffin had presented no evidence that a "significant number" of these 60,000 votes "were cast by individuals whose identity was not verified by voter identification or who were not otherwise qualified to vote." The court did rule in favor of challenges Griffin was bringing to a smaller pool of ballots, but that ruling was blocked by a federal judge. Griffin backed down from the legal fight earlier this month. Unlike Griffin's retrospective arguments, the court order that the Justice Department seeks is forward-looking, as the DOJ is demanding a sweeping process for updating the voter registrations of the 200,000 individuals said to be missing the numbers in the state's database. If a voter reports lacking the ID numbers in question when contacted by state election officials, under the process the DOJ lawsuit proposes, they would be assigned a special identifying number. The lawsuit, however, does not make clear whether the affected voters who do not respond to outreach from election officials should be purged from the rolls entirely. A spokesperson for the DOJ did not respond to CNN's request for clarity. Clerical errors that led to voters' ID numbers to not be recorded were flagged to North Carolina election officials well before the dispute over the state Supreme Court race, and they were subject to an unsuccessful Republican Party lawsuit brought before the 2024 election. The board has already fixed the registration forms that failed to list the ID numbers as required information. The new DOJ lawsuit, however, takes issue with the "ad hoc" plan the state board has put forward for updating the existing registrations missing the information – by having county officials collect it if and when those voters show up at polling places to vote. State law requires voters to show photo ID when they cast a ballot. Until recently, the majority of the election board's members were appointees of the Democratic governor. The board was recently reconfigured to be majority-Republican appointees, under a law passed by North Carolina's GOP-controlled legislature last year just before Republicans lost their supermajority in the state Capitol. Hayes was appointed as the board's new executive director by Republican majority. CNN's Hannah Rabinowitz and Ethan Cohen contributed to this report. For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

Trump administration sues North Carolina election officials over thousands of voter registrations

Trump administration sues North Carolina election officials over thousands of voter registrations The Justice Department filed a lawsuit Tue...
Trump asks US Supreme Court to intervene in deportations to third countriesNew Foto - Trump asks US Supreme Court to intervene in deportations to third countries

May 27 (Reuters) -President Donald Trump's administrationasked theU.S. Supreme Courton Tuesday to intervene in itseffort to rapidly deport migrants to countriesother than their own without the opportunity to raise claims that they fear being persecuted, tortured or killed there. The Justice Department requested that the justices lift Boston-based U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy'snationwide injunctionrequiring that migrants be given the chance to seek legal relief from deportation before they are sent to so-called "third countries," while litigation continues in the case. The administration's filing represents its latest trip to the nation's highest judicial body as it seeks a freer hand to pursueTrump's crackdown on immigrationand contest lower court decisions that have impeded the Republican president's policies. More:How Trump's clash with the courts is brewing into an 'all-out war' The administration said Murphy's injunction is preventing potentially thousands of pending deportations. The dispute arose after the Department of Homeland Security moved in February to determine if people granted protections against being removed to their home countries could be re-detained and sent to a third country. Immigrant rights groups mounted a class action lawsuit on behalf of a group of migrants seeking to prevent rapid deportation to newly identified third countries without notice and a chance to assert the harms they could face. In March, the administration issued guidance providing that if a third country has given credible diplomatic assurance that it will not persecute or torture migrants, individuals may be deported there "without the need for further procedures." Without such assurance, if the migrant expresses fear of removal to that country, U.S. authorities would assess the likelihood of persecution or torture, possibly referring the person to an immigration court, according to the guidance. Murphy issued a preliminary injunction in April, finding that the administration's policy of "executing third-country removals without providing notice and a meaningful opportunity to present fear-based claims" likely violates due process protections under U.S. Constitution's Fifth Amendment. Due process protections generally require the government to provide notice and an opportunity for a hearing before taking certain adverse actions. Murphy said that the Supreme Court, Congress, "common sense" and "basic decency" all require migrants to be given adequate due process. The Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on May 16 declined to put Murphy's decision on hold. The administration has said that its policy complies with due process requirements and that judge's injunction undermines the president's "broad authority" over immigration. As with previous cases challenging Trump's far-reaching executive actions and initiatives, the case raised further questions over whether the administration is defying court orders. Murphy on May 21 ruled that the administration had violated his court order by attempting to deport migrants to South Sudan. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Trump asks Supreme Court to step in on deportations to third countries

Trump asks US Supreme Court to intervene in deportations to third countries

Trump asks US Supreme Court to intervene in deportations to third countries May 27 (Reuters) -President Donald Trump's administrationask...
Trump's tax and policy bill takes center stage at lively Nebraska GOP town hallNew Foto - Trump's tax and policy bill takes center stage at lively Nebraska GOP town hall

US Congressman Mike Flood faced a torrent of boos and jeers as he spoke to town hall attendees in his Nebraska district on May 27, one of the first held nationwide as House GOP leaders return home after passing PresidentDonald Trump'ssweeping tax policy bill. "I thought your party wanted to reduce the deficit," one constituent questioned in writing about the bill, which would add an estimated $3.8 trillion to the deficit. "What in the world?" Another attendee said Flood, R-Nebraska, had previously claimed he wouldn't vote for a bill that cuts Social Security and Medicare, but the GOP bill now maytrigger mandatory budget reductionsthat could impact Medicare. "You either lied to us or you have been bullied into voting against our health care," she said. An audience member who identified themselves as a para-educator raised concerns that theschool voucher programincluded in the GOP bill would pull money from public schools and hurt children with learning disabilities. They asked: "How is that an equitable school choice for my child?" Unlike in previous town halls – which have grabbed headlines as attendees protested the Trump administration's rapidtransformation of the federal government– Flood's crowd had Congress in its sights. Just before House members left for their week-long recess, they passeda massive billthat would have major impacts for Americans' pocketbooks, their benefit systems for healthcare and food support, access to renewable energy and more. The bill will next beconsidered in the Senate, where it is expected to be tweaked before going back to the House and then the president's desk. Flood, who is the vice-chair of the pragmatic Main Street Caucus in the House GOP, is among the members holding in-person forums afterRepublican leaders advisedin March that they switch to virtual or telephone town halls after early in-person meetings were flooded with protesters. Flood opened the meeting by shaking hands with each attendee as they came in and noting that they are "all Nebraskans." "I don't think one of you is here because you're getting paid. I don't think one of you is here because you were trucked in," he said, a reference to a common refrain from some Republican members that angry crowds at town halls across the country are Democratic "paid protesters." Liberal groups such asIndivisiblehave promoted and encouraged their members to go to congressional town halls, but there is no evidence that attendees are being paid. Flood extended the one-hour town hall by an extra 30 minutes, fielding questions on the proposed changes to Medicaid and food stamps; the impact on schools, hospitals, children and people with disabilities; the effects of tax cuts and the increased deficit and more. The National Republican Congressional Committee, House Republican's campaign arm,has advised membersto "go on offense" on the new bill and tout the party's efforts to keep undocumented people off of benefit programs, cut taxes, and secure the southern border. Flood defended the legislation as necessary to avoid a tax increase at the end of the year, when the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act expires, and thechanges to Medicaidas reasonable reforms that will help protect benefits for deserving recipients in the long term. "Our unemployment is so low that anybody that can work is most likely working," he said, arguing that the new work requirements for able-bodied adults without children are unlikely to have a big impact on the state. The proposed reforms, which also include more eligibility checks andseveral other changes, are expected to save more than $625 billion and cause 7.6 million Americans to lose their health insurance over the next 10 years. Flood said that he didn't know about one section of the bill that would make itharder for federal judges to hold people in contempt, which may shield Trump and other administration officials who choose to violate court orders, and pledged to work with the Senate to change it. "I do not agree with that section that was added to that bill," Flood said, and the room exploded in jeers. "I believe in the rule of law... I do believe that the federal district courts, when issuing an injunction, it should have legal effect." Flood also pushed back on attendees who suggested that he and other Republicans in Congress are unwilling to break with Trump and are ceding their authority to the executive branch. "It is incumbent upon members of Congress like me to be aware of what's going on and to be vocal about it, and I am working on doing that," he said. "I am hearing you. I think what you're saying is important, and I think it's something that binds us together." This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Boos, jeers at Nebraska GOP town hall over Trump's tax bill

Trump's tax and policy bill takes center stage at lively Nebraska GOP town hall

Trump's tax and policy bill takes center stage at lively Nebraska GOP town hall US Congressman Mike Flood faced a torrent of boos and je...
They helped Democrats win back the House in 2018. Now they're taking on a new missionNew Foto - They helped Democrats win back the House in 2018. Now they're taking on a new mission

In 2018, Democrats won back the House — ending eight years of Republican control — with the help of dozens of candidates with national security backgrounds who vowed to serve as a check against the first Trump administration. This year, two of those successful candidates — Virginia's Abigail Spanberger and New Jersey's Mikie Sherrill — are taking on a new challenge followingPresident Donald Trump'sreturn to power: running for governor. AsDemocrats grapplewith how best to improve their diminished standing with voters, the upcoming races for governor in Virginia and New Jersey will serve as crucial tests for the party ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Spanberger's and Sherrill's campaigns could offer critical clues to next year's candidates as they seek to understand the mood of the electorate a year after Trump's 2024 victory. The two candidates — and former Capitol Hill roommates — are facing vastly different races. Sherrill is one of half a dozen candidates seeking to portray themselves as the Democratic fighter best positioned to take on the eventual Republican nominee and the Trump administration ahead of a June 10 primary. One recent Sherrill ad warns that Jack Ciattarelli, who was endorsed by Trump this month, will bring the president's "MAGA agenda" to the state. The spot highlights Sherrill's record as a Navy pilot and federal prosecutor and describes her as the Democrat "Republicans fear." Spanberger — who, like her Republican opponent, Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears, is running unopposed — is directing much of her focus toward criticizing the record of outgoing Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin. The former CIA intelligence officer has hammered Earle-Sears and Youngkin over their response to theDepartment of Government Efficiencyas the Elon Musk-led effort aims to shrink the size of the federal workforce that employs more than 300,000 Virginians. Spanberger, who did not run for reelection in the House last year, and Sherrill, who held on to her seat, are portraying themselves as results driven and willing to buck their party if necessary. "People can label me however they want as a question of policy, but I think what is the most substantial characteristic that I ascribe to myself is pragmatic," Spanberger told CNN in an interview earlier this year. "Throughout my time in Congress, my frustration — when I had expressed it at various different points in time — was rooted in that pragmatism." They are also testing out ways to message on economic concerns, an area where Trump held a significant advantage among voters last November but has seen some erosion amid his trade war. They're also acknowledging that, if they're elected in these new roles, they would be in a much better position to impact the lives of a larger swath of people. "At this moment, the fight is really in the states, that's where the front line is," Sherrill told CNN after a campaign event in Elizabeth, New Jersey. "It's going to be strong Democratic governors who can best help the nation." Sherrill said Democrats need to build the party from the ground up by "taking an expansive view of state power" as they push to make life more affordable for voters and run effective governments. Even as Democrats are working to counter Trump administration policies, the party must continue to keep a focus on kitchen-table issues, she said. "Sometimes we get caught up in some of the concerns we have — which are huge, huge concerns — about what's coming up in Washington, but don't always remind people of the work we're doing to drive down costs," Sherrill said. Democrats flipped 41 House seats in the 2018 midterm elections and elected 67 new members overall. Three cycles later, about half of them are still in office. Several have already sought higher office. Andy Kim of New Jersey and Elissa Slotkin of Michigan were both elected to the US Senate, while former Reps. Colin Allred of Texas, Debbie Mucarsel-Powell of Florida and Katie Porter of California lost Senate bids last year. A handful are also running in primaries ahead of next year's midterm elections. Former Interior Secretary and New Mexico Rep. Deb Haaland is running for governor in her state, as is Porter. Reps. Chris Pappas of New Hampshire, Haley Stevens of Michigan and Angie Craig of Minnesota are all running for Senate. Dan Sena, the executive director of House Democrats' campaign arm during the 2018 cycle, described the candidates who ran then as "independent, country first-driven" leaders who at times stood up to their own party. Sena, who is now working with an outside group supporting Sherrill's campaign, said Democrats should look to the 2018 recruiting formula next year. "They should be looking for candidates that can support the Democratic Party but look and feel like a different type of Democrat: a Democrat with a record of service, a Democrat that's a patriot, a Democrat that puts their country first," he said. Virginia and New Jersey shifted toward Trump during the2024 election, but history suggests political headwinds are likely to favor Democrats in the upcoming gubernatorial races. Over the last several decades both states have elected candidates from the party that lost the White House the year before, with two exceptions: Democrat Terry McAuliffe won the 2013 Virginia governor's race after President Barack Obama was reelected, and Democratic New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy was reelected in 2021 after President Joe Biden won in 2020. Both seats are open due to the incumbents being term-limited. Democrats are also hoping to capitalize on high-profile Republican legislation, just as they did in 2018 when Democratic candidates blasted their opponents over their votes backing a failed effort to repeal the Affordable Care Act. This time around, Democrats are pointing to thesweeping tax and spending cuts proposalHouse Republicans passed last week, which would add work requirements to Medicaid and make deep cuts to food stamps. "Winning these campaigns is really about being able to explain to voters the ways in which these candidates are going to stand up for them and fight for them," said Jessica Mackler, the president of EMILY's List, which works to elect women who support abortion rights and has long backed Spanberger and Sherrill. Republicans have started preparing their own messaging on the bill, arguing that provisions like no taxes on tips are popular, and that the restrictions on Medicaid benefits will sustain the program for those who need it most. "It's going to be imperative you tie them to national trends that are potentially negative in party politics that they're going to have to deal with in both New Jersey and Virginia," one GOP strategist who has worked on House campaigns said of Spanberger and the eventual Democratic nominee in New Jersey. Spanberger and the field of New Jersey Democratic gubernatorial candidates are attempting to rehabilitate the party's brand when it comes to economic issues. Or, at the very least, not be associated with it. Patricia Campos-Medina, a labor leader and former New Jersey US Senate candidate backing Sherrill, said affordability is the No. 1 issue for Garden State voters — including housing, transportation and energy bill costs. "That's how we counteract this idea that Trump and the Republicans are the only ones who care about the economy and your job," Campos-Medina said. "Democrats care about the economy and jobs and housing and schools and transportation, and that's the message that's going to resonate." At events in northern New Jersey, Sherrill repeatedly pointed to her proposals to build more residences to reduce housing costs. At a recent campaign event at a family-owned drugstore in Mechanicsville, a small, Republican-leaning town outside Richmond, Spanberger laid out her plan to lower health care and prescription drug costs. She also referenced the influence that health care issues had on her decision to first run for Congress. "Back in 2017 I watched my member of Congress vote to repeal the Affordable Care Act," Spanberger said. "It was then that I knew that I needed to run against him." As she highlighted her plan to boost the affordability of Virginia's health care as governor, Spanberger said she saw similarities between the 2017 health care debate and the current fight over the far-reaching domestic policy bill. "Now, unfortunately, we're seeing much of the same, which is an effort to further degrade a health care system that very frankly and objectively needs improvements," Spanberger told reporters. In interviews, Democratic primary voters in both New Jersey and Virginia said they were looking for governors who would serve as a check on the Trump administration. Many expressed frustrations with the Democratic Party, which they said either did not have a clear, unifying message or needed to focus more on affordability issues. Mary Butler, a 74-year-old retired social worker from Mechanicsville who attended Spanberger's speech and plans to support her in November, said health care access was deeply important to her because she saw how a lack of access could impact her former clients. Asked to assess national Democrats' performance, she said the party's vision wasn't being communicated well. "Why isn't there a really strong message being given — one clear, strong message?" Butler said. "It's a real question mark for me, I don't understand it." At a campaign stop over Memorial Day weekend, Sherrill gave her stump speech and took questions from a few dozen voters at a pizza shop in Jersey City, where one primary opponent, Steven Fulop, serves as mayor. The questions focused on housing costs, education and how Sherrill, as governor, would respond to parts of the president's agenda, such as immigration. Sherrill criticized Republicans, from Ciattarelli to members of Congress, for not pushing back on the president. She likened them to sailors on a ship ignoring impending danger for fear of reprisal over speaking out. "A lesson I learned in the Navy: The worst thing you can do is to run a ship aground," Sherrill said. "And you find when you do that, that people on that ship know it's going to run aground, and they don't say anything because they're scared." Susan Murphy, a 57-year-old retired theater teacher and Jersey City native, said she will vote for whoever wins the Democratic nomination, but she thought Sherrill seemed to be the strongest to go up against a "MAGA Republican." She said she viewed Democratic governors as a check on the administration and wondered why national leaders in her party seemed unprepared to take on the Trump administration at the start of his term. "I know that their hands are tied in terms of holding Trump accountable in many ways," she said. "My problem is, why weren't they ready? Why did it take so long?" David Patel, a 59-year-old business owner from Jersey City who is backing Sherrill, said Democrats "need to learn what people want." He said he sometimes gets frustrated with what he described as his party's tendency to focus on issues "that don't matter." Asked what those issues are, he instead pointed to what he would like to hear about: health care, job creation and training, and education. He said he hoped losing the presidential election would get the party back on track: "I think they got the message." For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

They helped Democrats win back the House in 2018. Now they’re taking on a new mission

They helped Democrats win back the House in 2018. Now they're taking on a new mission In 2018, Democrats won back the House — ending eig...

 

ISG POLITICS © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com