Tuesday, May 27, 2025

Pete Buttigieg Says Democrats Botched Three Things At Start Of Biden's TermNew Foto - Pete Buttigieg Says Democrats Botched Three Things At Start Of Biden's Term

Former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg on Tuesday listed three of the Democrats' major failures at the outset of former President Joe Biden's term. During an appearance on "The Bulwark," Buttigieg said Democrats didn't properly manage school closures during COVID, the southern border crisis, and inflation. "One, for the love of God, figure out a way to get the schools open sooner. We got very knee-jerk about this, and the costs were not just politically, but, in a profound way, I think for the generation, the costs were profound," Buttigieg told host Tim Miller when asked what Democrats should have done differently at the start of Biden's term. "And I think anybody who was involved who was, by the way, obviously doing their best to deal with a crisis that killed a million Americans. But I think most people involved would like to be able to have found a way to safely get more schools open more quickly." Buttigieg pivoted to immigration and said the border crisis was another issue that Democrats misjudged early on. WATCH: "Pay more attention to the border," Buttigieg said. "And that's going to be something that you can't just take your time to deal with. These are all things, by the way, that are super, policy-wise and politically. We have the benefit of hindsight to point to a lot of this." On the economy, Buttigieg said Democrats mistakenly believed that job growth alone was enough to define success. "Even though you spent your entire political lifetime believing that the economy and jobs are the same thing, and if you have lots of jobs, it's a good economy. And if you have a problem with jobs, it's a bad economy," Buttigieg said. "Remember that prices are just as big a part of the economy, it just hasn't come up much in the last 40 years. Those are some things I'd be whispering about." When asked what he would have done differently, Buttigieg said he would have addressed worries about inflation more seriously early on rather than wave them away as many did in the administration's first years.(RELATED: Buttigieg Says Black Babies Come At 'Discount' — Gets Smacked Down By Adoption Expert) "Look, no country was able to save their economy from COVID without getting into some inflation, some serious and painful inflation. But I do think that there were a lot of moments where people kind of waved it away in the first year or two, even just like the conversation about it, the focus," Buttigieg said. "It is true that we had no choice but to bring back the economy by any means necessary. We forget how grave the threat of a depression was in 2020 or 2021. When I came in, I spent a big part of my time as secretary dealing with getting airlines to treat their passengers better." Biden'seconomywasn't so great for American workers, with job growth falling short of expectations and inflation outpacing wages. Despite the repeated claims of economic strength, researchers told the Daily Caller News Foundation that record immigration and dwindling opportunities have left many Americans behind. Unemployment fell throughout most of President Donald Trump's first term, excluding the COVID-19 crisis, but it began rising under Biden, increasing from 3.4% in January 2023 to 4.2% by November 2024. Although the Biden-Harris administration claims to have added nearly 16 million jobs, that figure largely reflects Americansreturningto positions that they had lost during the pandemic. The Biden-Harris administration alsooversawthe largest net migration in U.S. history,drivenlargely byillegal immigration. Pew Researchestimatesthe unauthorized immigrant population reached 11 million in 2022, with the Center for Migration Studies reporting that 8.3 million undocumented immigrants now make up roughly 5.2% of the U.S. workforce. All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter's byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contactlicensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Pete Buttigieg Says Democrats Botched Three Things At Start Of Biden’s Term

Pete Buttigieg Says Democrats Botched Three Things At Start Of Biden's Term Former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg on Tuesday li...
Nevada Assembly OKs pay raise for charter, public teachersNew Foto - Nevada Assembly OKs pay raise for charter, public teachers

(The Center Square) - The Nevada AssemblypassedAssembly Bill 398, which aims to raise pay for charter school and hard-to-fill public school teacher positions. Assembly members last week voted 41-1 to pass the legislation, which now heads to the state Senate. Assembly Speaker Steve Yeager, D-Las Vegas, sponsored it. AB 398says charter school teachers and education support professionals are eligible for salary increases. Staff members who spend more than 50% of their time in a supervisory role are not qualified. For fiscal years 2025-26 and 2026-27, the Nevada State Public Charter School Authority will give $19.3 million to charter schools across the state. Nevada has 91charter schools. To qualify for this money, each charter school must submit a statement to the SPCSA stating the number of teachers and education support professionals it employed on Oct. 1, 2024. The SPCSA will submit this information by July 15 to the state Interim Finance Committee and estimate the total amount each charter school will receive for 2025-26. This exact process will be used the following year to determine each charter school's compensation. For fiscal year 2025-26, once charter schools submit this information to the SPCSA, they must propose another plan by Aug. 15 detailing how they will increase staff members' salaries. SPCSA must present this information to the IFC one month later, describing how charter schools will increase salaries for qualified positions. This same routine will be used for fiscal year 2026-2027 to govern how charter schools implement salary increases for staff members. AB 398 says the IFC will determine how money will be sent to charter schools based on an individual charter school's share of the total teachers and support staff as of Oct. 1, 2024. To illustrate, if a charter school had 20% of the state's charter school teachers and education support staff, it would get 20% of the distributed funds. AB 398 states that the money spent by charter schools must supplement teachers' income rather than replace it. Furthermore, the bill states that if IFC doesn't spend all its money for each fiscal year, the extra money must be returned to the state general fund. Zip Recruiter datashowsthat the average Nevada charter school teacher makes $58,556 annually. According to the education companyFullmind, over 10% of Nevada's teacher positions are unfilled. The company also found that the state has America's lowest teacher-to-student ratio: 43 teachers for 1,000 students. To help address this concern, AB 398 seeks to compensate teachers in hard-to-fill positions. The bill describes hard-to-fill positions as teaching jobs at Title 1 schools, which serve students from low-income families. AB 398 sets specific vacancy rate requirements for schools to qualify. High schools must have a vacancy rate of at least 15%, middle schools need at least 12% and elementary schools need at least 10%. The state Department of Education will give money to school districts to pay bonuses and other compensation for these positions. The bill states that the additional money can't be used to replace a teacher's base salary. Nevada school districts must submit an application to the IFC detailing the amount of money they are requesting, the number of hard-to-fill positions they have and sufficient documentation showing how they intend to use the additional resources. The IFC will allocate $45 million to school districts for the fiscal years 2025-26 and 2026-27. Unspent funds will need to go back to the state General Fund. Money that school districts get from IFC will be subject to collective bargaining. AB 398 requires school districts to report by Dec. 1 of each even-numbered year the number of teachers receiving extra pay, the total amount paid, and the number of hard-to-fill positions in their public schools. To pass this bill, the state Senate will have to act quickly, as the legislative session is expected to end June 2. Earlier in May, Gov. Joe Lombardosaidhe would veto any education budget bill that doesn't include pay raises for charter school teachers.

Nevada Assembly OKs pay raise for charter, public teachers

Nevada Assembly OKs pay raise for charter, public teachers (The Center Square) - The Nevada AssemblypassedAssembly Bill 398, which aims to r...
Victor Davis Hanson Names One Trump Agenda Item That Has Him 'Worried'New Foto - Victor Davis Hanson Names One Trump Agenda Item That Has Him 'Worried'

Hoover Institution Senior Fellow Victor Davis Hanson said Tuesday on his show that President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" has him worried about the potential debt it could add to the United States. Since its passage through Congress, a handful of Republican senators have come out against the budget reconciliation package. While discussing the issue on "The Victor Davis Hanson Show," Hanson said that although Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent wants to cap the GDP, the "big, beautiful bill" could end up increasing it. "The only thing I'm worried about, Jack, is the big, beautiful bill. It has questionable arithmetic on lowering the $2.1 trillion deficit. Scott Bessent said he wanted to keep the deficits at no more than 3% of GDP. And if this thing gets up, it could be $3 trillion. It could actually increase it. It could be 6% or 7% of GDP," Hanson said. "I'm glad they renewed the tax cuts that were going to expire, but the other tax cuts, you know, the SALT [state and local tax deduction] is going from $10,000 up to a higher number. That's going to lose a lot of revenue," Hanson added. "Then the tips and the first responders, if so, and I don't know whether Social Security will not be taxed or not. But then you have greater farmer subsidies, Pentagon budgets going up." On Thursday, the bill narrowlypassedCongress with a 215-214-1 vote, after Republican Reps. Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Warren Davidson of Ohio joined Democrats in voting "no." One Republican lawmaker voted "present."(RELATED: 'Big, Beautiful' Bill's Policies Prove Popular In Key House Districts, Poll Shows) WATCH: Both Republican senators Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and Rand Paul of Kentucky voiced their concerns duringinterviewson Sunday, with Paul calling for the debt ceiling to be removed. Hanson went on to say that the Trump administration has touted its "incentives" and goal of reaching "$10 trillion in federal investment" as it seeks to return the economy to conditions similar to Trump's first term. "They think they can get 4% of GDP, the deficit, get it down to 4%, not by cutting anymore. But what I'm getting at is, remember the golden days of January, February of 2025 when Elon, they hadn't gone after him yet?" Hanson asked. "He was confident. He said, 'I think we can get a trillion dollars in cuts.' Then he would smile and say, 'Who knows, maybe 2 trillion.'" "And that was out of $7 trillion. He was basically [saying], 'I think we can go back to the first year of the Obama expenditures.' But that's all gone with the wind, I guess, huh?" Hanson asked. "I'm really worried about the debt." After the bill's passage, Paultoldreporters he would be a hard no until the debt ceiling is removed, adding that the bill could cause the U.S. to face a yearly deficit of an estimated $2 trillion over the next two years. Additionally, JohnsontoldCNN's Jake Tapper that he believes there will not be enough GOP Senate members to move the bill to Trump's desk by the July 4 deadline. Other Republican senators have alsoraised concernsover potential cuts to Medicaid, the approval of Biden-era green energy subsidies, and a cap on state and local tax deductions. All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter's byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contactlicensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Victor Davis Hanson Names One Trump Agenda Item That Has Him ‘Worried’

Victor Davis Hanson Names One Trump Agenda Item That Has Him 'Worried' Hoover Institution Senior Fellow Victor Davis Hanson said Tue...
Judge bars Trump order against law firm tied to Robert MuellerNew Foto - Judge bars Trump order against law firm tied to Robert Mueller

By Mike Scarcella (Reuters) -A federal judge on Tuesday struck down an executive order targeting law firm WilmerHale, in the third ruling to overwhelmingly reject President Donald Trump's efforts to punish firms he perceives as enemies of his administration. U.S. District Judge Richard Leon, in Washington, an appointee of Republican President George W. Bush, said Trump's order retaliated against the firm in violation of U.S. constitutional protections for free speech and due process. "I have concluded that this order must be struck down in its entirety as unconstitutional," Leon wrote in his 73-page opinion. "Indeed, to rule otherwise would be unfaithful to the judgment and vision of the Founding Fathers!" Leon said Trump had penalized WilmerHale for hiring Robert Mueller, the Republican-appointed special counsel who led a probe into Russia's interference in the 2016 presidential election and Trump campaign ties to Moscow. Trump has derided the investigation as a political "witch hunt." In a statement, WilmerHale said Leon's ruling "strongly affirms our foundational constitutional rights and those of our clients. We remain proud to defend our firm, our people, and our clients." White House spokesman Harrison Fields in a statement said Trump acted within his power by rescinding security clearances for the firm's attorneys. Reviewing the president's clearance decisions "falls well outside the judiciary's authority," Fields said. WilmerHale was among four law firms that sued the administration over Trump's orders, which suspended their lawyers' security clearances and sought to bar them from federal buildings and strip their clients of U.S. federal government contracts. WilmerHale called Trump's order "flagrantly" unconstitutional, arguing it violated its rights to speech, due process and equal protection under the law. The firm in its lawsuit was represented by prominent conservative lawyer Paul Clement, who was the U.S. solicitor general during the George W. Bush presidency. Leon barred federal agencies from enforcing the March 27 executive order against WilmerHale, a 1,200-lawyer firm with offices in Washington, D.C., and across the country. He called the order "a staggering punishment for the firm's protected speech" that harmed its ability to represent its clients. In a related lawsuit, U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell on May 2 overturned Trump's executive order against law firm Perkins Coie. On May 23, U.S. District Judge John Bates issued a similar ruling that struck down Trump's order against Jenner & Block. A fourth judge is weighing whether to overturn an executive order that targeted Susman Godfrey. The U.S. Justice Department has defended Trump's orders in court, arguing in each case that Trump was lawfully exercising his presidential power and discretion. Trump has accused the firms of "weaponizing" the justice system against him and his allies. The Justice Department can appeal Leon's order to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Nine law firms, including Paul Weiss, Latham & Watkins; Skadden Arps; and Willkie Farr, reached deals with Trump that averted punitive actions, pledging a combined total of nearly $1 billion in free legal services to advance causes he supports. Trump's targeting of firms has drawn condemnation from many within the legal industry. Some have criticized the firms that reached agreements as capitulating to presidential coercion. (Reporting by Mike Scarcella in Washington, D.C., and additional reporting by David Thomas; Editing by David Bario and Bill Berkrot)

Judge bars Trump order against law firm tied to Robert Mueller

Judge bars Trump order against law firm tied to Robert Mueller By Mike Scarcella (Reuters) -A federal judge on Tuesday struck down an execut...
Department of Justice sues North Carolina elections boardNew Foto - Department of Justice sues North Carolina elections board

(The Center Square) – Fresh off a state Supreme Court race getting settled half a year after the election, the North Carolina State Board of Elections has been sued by the United States of America. The Department of Justice filed the litigation on Tuesday in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina Western Division. The plaintiffs say the state was in violation of the intent of the Help America Vote Act, colloquially called HAVA. The state, a release says, "used a state voter registration form that did not require a voter to provide identifying information such as a driver's license or last four digits of a Social Security number. Voters were then added to the state's voter registration roll without the required information, and many of these voters remain on the registration rolls without it." Observers of politics and the laws around it forecast that despite Judge Jefferson Griffin eventually losing an arduous battle to Judge Allison Riggs earlier this month, his fight would help candidates in the future. The race attracting more than $2.3 million in donations was the last unresolved from Nov. 5 when on May 7 the Republican appellate judge conceded to the Democratic incumbent. On Election Night, with 2,658 precincts reporting, Griffin led Riggs by 9,851 votes of 5,540,090 cast. Provisional and absentee ballots that qualified were added to the totals, swinging the race by 10,585 votes. Board of elections decisions and court rulings at Wake County Superior Court, the state's Court of Appeals and Supreme Court, and the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals protracted the final decision. The protests of Griffin involved about 65,000 ballots. The state board denied all six, including registration records of voters such as lack of providing either a driver's license number or the last four digits of a Social Security number. Other ballots protested and denied by the state board included voters overseas who have never lived in the United States, and for lack of photo identification provided with military and overseas voters. "Accurate voter registration rolls are critical to ensure that elections in North Carolina are conducted fairly, accurately, and without fraud," said Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon of the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division. "The Department of Justice will not hesitate to file suit against jurisdictions that maintain inaccurate voter registration rolls in violation of federal voting laws." While the lawsuit names current members of the election board, the actions prior to May 1 came from the previous group. Named in their capacities in the complaint are Sam Hayes as executive director; Republicans Francis DeLuca, Stacy Eggers and Bob Rucho; and Democrats Siobhan Millen and Jeff Carmon. DeLuca is the chairman. The group when Griffin's protests were denied included Executive Director Karen Brinson Bell; Democrats Alan Hirsch, its chairman, Jeff Carmon and Siobhan Millen; and Republicans Stacy Eggers and Kevin Lewis. For the majority of protest decisions, the voting by this group was 3-2 along party lines.

Department of Justice sues North Carolina elections board

Department of Justice sues North Carolina elections board (The Center Square) – Fresh off a state Supreme Court race getting settled half a ...

 

ISG POLITICS © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com