Tuesday, May 27, 2025

Judge accuses the Trump administration of 'manufacturing' chaos in migrant deportation caseNew Foto - Judge accuses the Trump administration of 'manufacturing' chaos in migrant deportation case

WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge suggested the Trump administration was "manufacturing" chaos and said he hoped that "reason can get the better of rhetoric" in a scathing order in a case aboutgovernment efforts to deporta handful of migrants from various countries to South Sudan. Inthe order publishedMonday evening, Judge Brian Murphy wrote that he had given the Trump administration "remarkable flexibility with minimal oversight" in the case and emphasized the numerous times he attempted to work with the government. "From the course of conduct, it is hard to come to any conclusion other than that Defendants invite a lack of clarity as a means of evasion," the Boston-based Murphy wrote in the 17-page order. Murphy oversees a case in which immigration advocates are attempting to prevent the Trump administration from sending migrants they're trying to deport from the U.S. to countries that they're not from without giving them a meaningful chance to protest their removal. The judge said the men couldn't advocate for themselves In a hearing last week called to address reportsthat eight immigrantshad been sent to South Sudan, Murphy said the men hadn't been able to argue that the deportation could put them in danger. But instead of ordering the government to return the men to the U.S. for hearings — as the plaintiffs wanted — he gave the government the option of holding the hearings in Djibouti where the plane had flown on its way to South Sudan as long as the men remained in U.S. government custody. Days later, the Trump administration filed another motion saying that Murphy was requiring them to hold "dangerous criminals in a sensitive location." But in his order Monday he emphasized repeatedly that it was the government's "own suggestion" that they be allowed to process the men's claims while they were still abroad. "It turns out that having immigration proceedings on another continent is harder and more logistically cumbersome than Defendants anticipated," Murphy wrote. The government has argued that the men had a history with the immigration system, giving them prior opportunities to express a fear of being deported to a country outside their homeland. And they've said that the men's home — Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Myanmar, Vietnam and South Sudan — would not take them back. The administration has also repeatedly emphasized the men's criminal histories in the U.S. and portrayed them as national security threats. The administration is relying on third countries The Trump administration has increasingly relied on third countries to takeimmigrantswho cannot be sent to their home countries for various reasons. Some countries simply refuse to take back their citizens being deported while others take back some but not all of their citizens. And some cannot be sent to their home countries because of concerns they'll be tortured or harmed. Historically that has meant that immigration enforcement officials have had to release people into the U.S. that it wants to deport but can't. But the Trump administration has leaned on other countries to take them. In the Western Hemisphere, El Salvador, Costa Rica and Panama have all agreed to take some people being removed from the U.S., with El Salvador being the most controversial example because it is holding people deported from the U.S. in a notorious prison. The Trump administration has said it's exploring other third countries for deportations. Murphy said in his order that the eight men were initially told May 19 they'd be going to South Africa and then later that same day were told they were going to South Sudan. He noted that the U.S. government "has issued stark warnings regarding South Sudan." He said the men had fewer than 16 hours between being told they were going to be removed and going to the airport "most of which were non-waking hours" and "limited, if any" ability to talk to family or a lawyer. "Given the totality of the circumstances, it is hard to take seriously the idea that Defendants intended these individuals to have any real opportunity to make a valid claim," the judge wrote.

Judge accuses the Trump administration of 'manufacturing' chaos in migrant deportation case

Judge accuses the Trump administration of 'manufacturing' chaos in migrant deportation case WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge sugges...
US government to have control in Nippon Steel-U.S. Steel deal, Trump and McCormick sayNew Foto - US government to have control in Nippon Steel-U.S. Steel deal, Trump and McCormick say

HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — U.S. Sen. David McCormick said Tuesday that an arrangement that will allow Japan-based Nippon Steel to invest in U.S. Steel will guarantee an American CEO, a majority of board members from the United States and U.S. government approval over certain corporate functions. McCormick spoke on CNBC, four days after PresidentDonald Trumpsuggested that an agreement on a "partnership" was at hand to resolve Nippon Steel'snearly $15 billion bidto buy iconic American steelmaker U.S. Steel that has been blocked on national security grounds. Followinghis statement Friday, Trump on Sunday told reporters that U.S. Steel will be "controlled by the United States, otherwise I wouldn't make the deal" and that "it's an investment and it's a partial ownership but it'll be controlled by the U.S.A." McCormicksaid the idea was Nippon Steel's proposal, even though Nippon Steel has yet to say anything about whether it is willing to accept the concept described by Trump and McCormick in place of its bid to control the company. Many of the aspects outlined by McCormick and Trump have been floated previously by Nippon Steel. Keeping U.S. Steel's headquarters had always been part of Nippon Steel's bid to buy it. Nippon had pledged to put U.S. Steel under a board made up of a majority of American citizens, with a management team made up of American citizens. Nippon Steel also had pledged not to conduct layoffs or plant closings as a result of the transaction and to protect the best interests of U.S. Steel in trade matters. Tosweeten the deal, Nippon Steel had offered up a $2.7 billion commitment to upgrade U.S. Steel's two blast furnaces and pledged that it wouldn't import steel slabs that would compete with the facilities. Nippon Steel did issue an approving statement on Friday that said the "partnership between Nippon Steel and U. S. Steel is a game changer." But it didn't describe terms of a deal or say whether it had agreed to any final terms. McCormick said Nippon has agreed to invest $14 billion into U.S. Steel, with a "national security agreement" that will be signed with the U.S. government. The deal entails an American CEO, an American-majority board and a "golden share" which requires U.S. government approval of a number of the board members to will allow the U.S. to ensure that production levels aren't cut, McCormick said. The deal involves building a new electric arc furnace — a more modern steel mill that melts down scrap — and investing $2.4 billion into the U.S. Steel facilities in the Pittsburgh area, including the Edgar Thomson Works blast furnace that was built in the 19th century. McCormick said Nippon Steel will have members of the board and the entity will be "part of their overall corporate structure." He also said Nippon Steel gets what they wanted, which is access to the U.S. market and the benefits of the long-running protectionistU.S. tariffsthat analysts say has helped reinvigorate domestic steel. "I think they know what they're getting into," McCormick said. "They negotiated it. It was their proposal, and I think they saw it as a great strategic move for them and one that's great for the United States." U.S. Steel's board and shareholders had approved Nippon Steel's bid, but it was opposed by the United Steelworkers union andwas blockedby former President Joe Biden on his way out of office. After Trump became president, he subjected it to anothernational security reviewby the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States.

US government to have control in Nippon Steel-U.S. Steel deal, Trump and McCormick say

US government to have control in Nippon Steel-U.S. Steel deal, Trump and McCormick say HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — U.S. Sen. David McCormick said...
An officer partially blinded a teen amid George Floyd protests. Was force excessive?New Foto - An officer partially blinded a teen amid George Floyd protests. Was force excessive?

WASHINGTON − TheSupreme Courton May 27 ordered another look at whether a police officer who partially blinded a teenager during the 2020 George Floyd protests can be sued. Lower courts said a jury could reasonably conclude that Ethan Daniel Marks was not an immediate threat to police when a Minneapolis police officer shot him in the face with a chemical-filled projectile, making him legally blind in one eye. The officer, Benjamin Bauer, said he chose a less-lethal way of stopping what he said was an assault on a fellow cop. Bauer appealed to theSupreme Court,which vacated the St. Louis-based 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeal decision allowing the suit to move forward. But the justices directed the appeals court to reconsider the case in light of itsrecent decisionabout a fatal traffic stop. In that case, the justices said courts can look beyond the exact moment a police officer is using deadly force to determine if the force was unreasonable. More:Supreme Court revives suit against cop who fatally shot driver stopped for unpaid tolls That decision benefited the family of the man who was shot during the traffic stop for unpaid tolls. But the court's May 27 order helps the police officer. And it came the week after after the Justice Department said it'sdropping negotiationsfor a court-approved settlement with Minneapolis, despite having found that authorities routinely violated the civil rights of Black people. Related:Changing the narrative: How Trump 2.0 is reframing George Floyd and the 2020 protests Floyd was murdered on May 25, 2020, when Chauvin kneeled on Floyd's neck as he pleaded that he couldn't breathe. (In 2023, the Supreme Courtturned awayan appeal from Derek Chauvin, the former Minneapolispolice officer convicted of killing George Floyd, who argued that riots in the city biased the jury against him.) Three days after Floyd's murder, Marks and his mother went to an area near the police station that was the epicenter of the protests. Related:Supreme Court declines appeal from Derek Chauvin to review conviction in George Floyd murder Officer Jonathan Pobuda blocked Marks' mother, a registered nurse, from trying to approach a woman who had been injured, prompting Marks, then 19-years-old, to confront Pobuda. That officer pushed Marks back with his riot baton. Bauer, believing Pobuda was being assaulted, shot Marks in the face with a projectile at close range. Marks sued Bauer for using excessive force. Related:DOJ abandons police reform settlements over deaths of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor A federal district court and the 8thU.S. Circuit Court of Appeals allowed Marks' suit to proceed. Two of the three circuit judges who heard the case said Marks made a compelling showing that Bauer used more force than needed when Marks was no longer resisting the other officer and was falling backwards to the ground. A third judge disagreed, writing that the chaos and violence that quickly enveloped the officers made it impossible to conclude that Bauer had clearly violated Marks' rights. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Teen partially blinded at George Floyd protest; Supreme Court wades in

An officer partially blinded a teen amid George Floyd protests. Was force excessive?

An officer partially blinded a teen amid George Floyd protests. Was force excessive? WASHINGTON − TheSupreme Courton May 27 ordered another ...
Europe is in crisis, Polish nationalist presidential candidate tells conservative conferenceNew Foto - Europe is in crisis, Polish nationalist presidential candidate tells conservative conference

WARSAW (Reuters) -Europe is in crisis and needs Poland to "wake it up," Polish nationalist presidential candidate Karol Nawrocki said on Tuesday, speaking to the Conservative Political Action Conference in Poland. The most prominent U.S. conservative gathering, founded on the ideals of personal liberty and limited government, convened in the eastern city of Rzeszow. It was meeting in Europe for only the second time after a gathering in Hungary in 2022. Nawrocki was speaking at the CPAC as part of his campaign ahead of the presidential election's second round on Sunday, with polls showing him just behind liberal candidate Rafal Trzaskowski. Nawrocki, a candidate supported by the main opposition party, Law and Justice (PiS), wants Poland to follow a path inspired by U.S. President Donald Trump and regards Washington as a key ally, rather than Brussels. "Europe today is in a great crisis," Nawrocki told the conservative gathering, standing in front of a screen with the Polish and U.S. national flags. He added that Europe needs the voice of conservatives to rouse it from its current state of being sidelined in economic geopolitics and its own security. Nawrocki highlighted his recent visit to the White House, emphasising the importance of strong transatlantic ties. "I will ensure that Poland becomes the leader of the European Union in transatlantic relations," he said. He also spoke against the hate speech act, a law that would expand Poland's hate crime laws to include sexual orientation, gender, age and disability as protected categories. "We cannot allow our freedom of speech to be taken away," Nawrocki said. (Reporting by Barbara Erling and Anna Wlodarczak-Semczuk; Editing by Rod Nickel)

Europe is in crisis, Polish nationalist presidential candidate tells conservative conference

Europe is in crisis, Polish nationalist presidential candidate tells conservative conference WARSAW (Reuters) -Europe is in crisis and needs...
Trump is considering new sanctions on Russia as he grows frustrated over attacks in UkraineNew Foto - Trump is considering new sanctions on Russia as he grows frustrated over attacks in Ukraine

President Donald Trump could move ahead with new sanctions on Russia in the coming days as he vents frustration at Russian President Vladimir Putin for his aerial assault on Ukraine over the weekend, according to people familiar with the matter. Options were drawn up in the past several weeks to apply new measures punishing Moscow, but so far Trump hasnot approved them. The president said Sunday he would "absolutely" consider new sanctions in the aftermath of a sustained missile and drone bombardment that left many dead. "He's killing a lot of people," Trump said of Putin on Sunday. "I don't know what's wrong with him. What the hell happened to him?" Trump could still decide not to apply the new sanctions, the people said, in keeping with past examples of him backing away from threats to target Russia over its actions in Ukraine. Trump has said privately he is concerned new sanctions could push Russia away from peace talks. Democratic and Republican lawmakers are lobbying Trump to significantly ratchet up US sanctions after the weekend attacks. "All of us, by our public statements as well as private contacts, are pressing very, very hard," Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal told CNN on Monday. Blumenthal is a key figure behind a cross-party Senate bill, also sponsored by Trump ally Sen. Lindsey Graham, which aims to impose "crippling" new measures on Moscow. It would include "secondary sanctions," like massive 500% tariffs on countries buying Russian energy. More than 80 senators have signed on to the bipartisan bill so far. Afterspeaking with Putin last week, Trump told European leaders on a telephone call that he would not join them, for now, in applying new measures on Moscow, even though he had previously signaled a willingness to take a tougher approach to Putin, a European official said. Trump "believes, that right now if you start threatening sanctions, the Russians will stop talking, and there is value in us being able to talk to them and to drive them to get to the table," Secretary of State Marco Rubio told lawmakers on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee last week, a day after Trump and Putin spoke over the phone. "Like we will see, look they have to do this, no one is claiming that this is a guarantee." After Trump's most recent comments, French President Emmanuel Macron voiced hope the US leader would change course. "President Trump realizes that when President Putin said on the phone he was ready for peace, or told his envoys he was ready for peace, he lied," Macron said Monday. "We have seen once again in recent hours Donald Trump express his anger. A form of impatience. I simply hope now that this translates into action." Trmp has previously raised the notion of new sanctions on Russia's banking sector and secondary sanctions on purchasers of Russian energy products. Both options have been drawn up, but it wasn't clear what specific steps Trump was considering in the wake of Russia's weekend bombardment in Ukraine. This story has been updated with additional reporting. Matthew Chance contributed to this report. For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

Trump is considering new sanctions on Russia as he grows frustrated over attacks in Ukraine

Trump is considering new sanctions on Russia as he grows frustrated over attacks in Ukraine President Donald Trump could move ahead with new...

 

ISG POLITICS © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com