Tuesday, May 27, 2025

US Supreme Court rejects case about student's 'There are only two genders' T-shirtNew Foto - US Supreme Court rejects case about student's 'There are only two genders' T-shirt

By John Kruzel WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court declined on Tuesday to hear a student's challenge on free speech grounds to a Massachusetts public school's decision to bar him from wearing a T-shirt reading "There are only two genders" due to concern about the message's effect on transgender and other pupils. The justices turned away an appeal by the student, who was 12 at the time of the 2023 incident, of a lower court's ruling upholding the ban as a reasonable restriction and rejecting his claim that the school's action violated the U.S. Constitution's protections against government abridgment of speech. The student, identified in court papers as "L.M." because he is a minor, sued officials at John T. Nichols Middle School and the town of Middleborough, seeking monetary damages. A trial judge and then the Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against him. The 1st Circuit decision stated that "it was reasonable for Middleborough to forecast that a message displayed throughout the school day denying the existence of the gender identities of transgender and gender nonconforming students would have a serious negative impact on those students' ability to concentrate on their classroom work." The legal dispute implicates a 1969 Supreme Court precedent in a case known as Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District that lets public schools restrict student speech when it would "substantially disrupt" a school community. The issue of transgender rights is front and center in the U.S. culture wars. Since returning to office in January, Republican President Donald Trump has taken a hardline stance on transgender rights, targeting "gender ideology" and declaring that the U.S. government would recognize two sexes: male and female. The Supreme Court on May 6 permitted Trump's administration to implement his ban on transgender people in the military, allowing the armed forces to discharge the thousands of current transgender troops and reject new recruits while legal challenges play out. L.M., who was a seventh grade student at the time, wore the T-shirt reading "There are only two genders" to school in March 2023. His lawyers said in court papers he did so in order to "share his view that gender and sex are identical, and there are only two sexes - male and female." "L.M. hoped to start a meaningful conversation on gender ideology, a matter of public concern; protect other students against ideas that L.M. considers false and harmful; and show them compassionate people can believe that sex is binary," his lawyers wrote in a Supreme Court filing. A teacher reported the shirt to the school principal's office, noting that LGBT students were present at school that day and expressing concerns that the shirt could disrupt classes. The principal asked the boy if he would be willing to change his shirt and return to class, but he declined. The principal then called the boy's father, Chris Morrison, who opted to pick up his son from school rather than have him remove his shirt. Morrison, after complaining to school officials about the incident, was referred to the dress code in the school's student handbook. It states: "Clothing must not state, imply, or depict hate speech or imagery that target(s) groups based on race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, religious affiliation or any other classification." In May 2023, L.M. again wore the T-shirt to school, but covered the words "only two" with a piece of tape that read "censored," thus bearing the message: "There are (censored) genders." L.M. removed that shirt after being asked by school officials. During the proceedings, the school system's superintendent said that some students at John T. Nichols Middle School "have attempted to commit suicide or have had suicidal ideations in the past few years, including members of the LGBTQ+ community," and that some of those students' struggles were "related to their treatment based on their gender identities by other students." The boy, who brought the lawsuit along with his father and stepmother, are represented in the lawsuit by Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative legal group that has represented clients in various high-profile cases before the Supreme Court. The plaintiffs sought a court order prohibiting school officials from barring his wearing of the T-shirt and declaring the disputed portions of the dress code unconstitutional. They also sought unspecified monetary damages. U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani, an appointee of Democratic former President Barack Obama, ruled in favor of the school officials. Her decision was upheld last year by the 1st Circuit, prompting the Supreme Court appeal. The Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, is expected to rule by the end of June in a major transgender rights case. During arguments in the case in December, the conservative justices signaled their willingness to uphold a Republican-backed ban in Tennessee on gender-affirming medical care for transgender minors. (Reporting by John Kruzel; Editing by Will Dunham)

US Supreme Court rejects case about student's 'There are only two genders' T-shirt

US Supreme Court rejects case about student's 'There are only two genders' T-shirt By John Kruzel WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S...
Supreme Court turns away Native American lawsuit over copper mine on sacred landNew Foto - Supreme Court turns away Native American lawsuit over copper mine on sacred land

WASHINGTON — TheSupreme Courton Tuesday declined to consider whether Native Americans can challenge a massive copper mining project in Arizona that would destroy a sacred site used for tribal ceremonies, a weighty dispute that pitted religious rights against business interests. The court rejected an appeal brought by the nonprofit group Apache Stronghold asserting that its members' religious rights will be violated if the Resolution Copper mine goes forward because it would obliterate Oak Flat, the site in question. The Trump administrationrecently announcedits backing of the project. The court order noted that conservative Justice Samuel Alito did not participate. It did not say why. Conservative justices Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas said they would have taken up the case. Gorsuch, known for his backing of Native Americans in other cases, said in a dissenting opinion it was a "grievous mistake" not to hear the challenge. The focus of attention is a law passed by Congress in 2014, which transferred the land from federal ownership to Resolution Copper, a joint venture of mining companies Rio Tinto and BHP. Resolution Copper says the mine could supply around 25 percent of the nation's copper, with the metal in high demand for renewable energy projects and electric vehicles. Apache Stronghold said tribal members' religious rights were violated both under the Constitution's First Amendment and a federal law called the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. Oak Flat has been used for years by Western Apaches, a group of Native Americans that includes various tribes including the San Carlos Apache Tribe, which is based on a nearby reservation. Oak Flat is within the Tonto National Forest, about 70 miles east of Phoenix. "Oak Flat lies within the tribe's ancestral territory and is central to traditional Apache religion as the home of Apache deities and the only place where Apaches can practice unique ceremonies," lawyers for the San Carlos Apache Tribe wrote in court papers backing the appeal. According to Apache Stronghold, the site is the dwelling place of spiritual beings called the Ga'an and acts as "a direct corridor to the Creator." The site is used for sweat lodge ceremonies to mark boys reaching manhood and the multi-day "Sunrise Ceremony" that celebrates girls reaching womanhood. An environmental study found that if the mine is built, locations used for various ceremonies would be destroyed, with the land subsiding to create a giant crater almost two miles wide. The case reached the Supreme Court after the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals narrowly ruled against Apache Stronghold earlier this year, concluding that the land transfer did not "substantially burden" the ability of tribe members to exercise their religious rights. A district court judge had earlier reached the same conclusion. Key factors in the case are that the land at issue was owned by the federal government, not any of the tribes, and was transferred by an act of Congress. The United States originally took control of the land in the mid 19th century. It signed an 1852 treaty with Apache chiefs that pledged to protect tribal interests, but as with other treaties with tribes, the government failed to live up to its obligations. Apache Stronghold's lawsuit also contained a claim under the 1852 treaty, but that issue is not before the Supreme Court. The court's 6-3 conservative majority regularly backs religious rights in cases that often involve claims brought by Christians. The Apache case was different in part because it involved Native Americans and had the attention of powerful interests eager to make the mining project happen. In court papers filed before President Donald Trump took office, former Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar urged the court not to hear the case, saying that while the government respects the tribe's religious beliefs "Congress has specifically mandated that Oak Flat be transferred so that the area can be used for mining." Furthermore, she added, there is no precedent for concluding that the government can violate religious rights by making decisions about its own land. But Apache Stronghold had some strong support of its own, including legal groups that have previously prevailed at the Supreme Court when representing conservative Christians, such as religious rights group Becket. Various religious groups, including the Presbyterian Church and the Episcopalian Church filed briefs urging the Supreme Court to take the case.

Supreme Court turns away Native American lawsuit over copper mine on sacred land

Supreme Court turns away Native American lawsuit over copper mine on sacred land WASHINGTON — TheSupreme Courton Tuesday declined to conside...
The Supreme Court rejects a plea to block a copper mine on land in Arizona that's sacred to ApachesNew Foto - The Supreme Court rejects a plea to block a copper mine on land in Arizona that's sacred to Apaches

WASHINGTON (AP) — TheSupreme Courton Tuesday rejected an appeal from Apaches who are fighting to halt a massive copper mining project onfederal land in Arizonathat they hold sacred. The justices left in place lower court decisions allowing the transfer of the Tonto National Forest land, known as Oak Flat, to Resolution Copper, which plans to mine what it says is the second-largest known copper deposit in the world. The Trump administration has said it will push to complete the transfer. A group known as Apache Stronghold, representing the interests of certain members of the San Carlos Apache Tribe, has argued thatthe land transferwill result in the destruction of the site in violation of its members' religious rights. Apache tribes in Arizona consider Oak Flat, which is dotted with ancient oak groves and traditional plants, essential to their spiritual well-being. An estimated 40 billion pounds of copper could be mined over the lifetime of the mine, according to the U.S. Forest Service. The project has significant support innearby Superiorand other traditional mining towns in the area. The company estimates the mine will generate $1 billion a year for Arizona's economy and create thousands of local jobs. Resolution Copper is a subsidiary of international mining giants Rio Tinto and BHP. Congress approved a land swap in 2014 that would give Resolution Copper 3.75 square miles (9.71 square kilometers) of forest land in return for eight parcels it owns in Arizona. In the waning days of the first Trump administration, the U.S. Agriculture Department issued the required environmental review that would allow the land swap to proceed. Apache Stronghold sued in federal court to block it. With the change in administrations to President Joe Biden, the Agriculture Department, which includes the Forest Service,pulled back the reviewto further consult with Native American tribes. But the suit proceeded and a year ago, the federal appeals court in San Francisco split 6-5 to allow the land transfer to go forward, rejecting Apache Stronghold's arguments about religious freedom and its invocation of a 1852 treaty between the U.S. government and the Apaches. The five dissenting judges described the outcome as a tragic error that would result in "the utter destruction" of the sacred site. The Forest Service already has provided the 60 days notice that it intends to re-issue the environmental review, as required by a court order.

The Supreme Court rejects a plea to block a copper mine on land in Arizona that's sacred to Apaches

The Supreme Court rejects a plea to block a copper mine on land in Arizona that's sacred to Apaches WASHINGTON (AP) — TheSupreme Courton...
Supreme Court rejects student's challenge to 'two genders' T-shirt banNew Foto - Supreme Court rejects student's challenge to 'two genders' T-shirt ban

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to hear a Massachusetts student's challenge to his middle school's prohibition on him wearing a T-shirt bearing the slogan "There are only two genders." The case arose from student Liam Morrison's dispute with Nichols Middle School in Middleborough. Lawyers for Morrison at the Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative Christian legal advocacy group, say students were "bombarded" with messages promoting the view "that sex and gender are self-defined, limitless, and unmoored from biology." Morrison believes that view is "false and harmful" and responded in March 2023 when he was in seventh grade by wearing the T-shirt. After he was told to remove it, he later wore another shirt that said "There are [censored] genders." Morrison was not punished for wearing the shirts, although he was told he could not wear them in class and was sent home when he refused to remove the first one. Two conservative members of the court, Justice Clarence Thomas and Justice Samuel Alito, dissented from the decision not to hear the case. "This case presents an issue of great importance for our nation's youth: whether public schools may suppress student speech either because it expresses a viewpoint that the school disfavors or because of vague concerns about the likely effect of the speech on the school atmosphere or on students who find the speech offensive," Alito wrote. The case raised questions about the extent of free speech rights for public school students under the Constitution's First Amendment, which was recognized in a landmark 1969 ruling that found students had the right to wear armbands protesting the Vietnam War. School administrators point to the student dress code, which bars any "hate speech or imagery," saying they were merely enforcing those requirements in order to avoid disruption in school. Morrison's lawyers say the dress code's restrictions on speech are unconstitutional. Both a federal district court judge and the Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the school. The appeals court concluded that based on the 1969 ruling, school officials can bar "passive and silently expressed messages" that demean other people even if the expression at issue does not target a specific student. The Supreme Court is currently weighinga case from Marylandover an attempt by parents to ensure elementary school children can opt out of LGBT-focused books that might be read in class.

Supreme Court rejects student’s challenge to ‘two genders’ T-shirt ban

Supreme Court rejects student's challenge to 'two genders' T-shirt ban WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to hea...
The Latest: Trump pays tribute to fallen soldiers in service at Arlington National CemeteryNew Foto - The Latest: Trump pays tribute to fallen soldiers in service at Arlington National Cemetery

President Donald Trumppaid tribute to fallen service members during aMemorial Day ceremonyat Arlington National Cemetery in an address that honored the "great, great warriors" yet also briefly veered into politics as he boasted of a nation he's "fixing after a long and hard four years." Though the holiday is one U.S. presidents typically treat with pure solemnity, Trump began it with a Memorial Day social media post that attacked his predecessor and calledfederal judges who've blockedhis deportation initiatives "monsters who want our country to go to hell." Here's the latest: US envoy to Ukraine says Vatican is out as site for talks on ending Russia-Ukraine war Keith Kellogg, the U.S. special envoy to Ukraine, said the Russians don't want to go to the Vatican. "We would have liked to have it at the Vatican and we were pretty set to do something like that, but the Russians didn't want to go there, to the Vatican, so I think Geneva may be the next stop," Kellogg said in an interview Tuesday on Fox News Channel. Trump had said last week after speaking with Russian President Vladimir Putin that the Vatican had expressed interest in hosting the negotiations, though there was no confirmation that any talks had been scheduled. Kellogg also said Russia has yet to deliver a memorandum that Putin said Moscow would work on with Ukraine to draft a framework for a possible future peace treaty. Trump administration moves to cut federal contracts for Harvard The Trump administration is asking federal agencies to cancel remaining contracts with Harvard University, a senior administration official said Tuesday. The government already has canceled more than $2.6 billion in federal research grants for the Ivy League school, which has pushed back onthe administration's demandsfor changes to several of its policies. Cuts to contracts could take away millions more from Harvard's budget. A draft letter from the General Services Administration directs agencies to review contracts with the university and seek alternate vendors. The administration is planning to send a version of the letter Tuesday, the official said. The official spoke on condition of anonymity to describe internal deliberations. The New York Times first reported on the letter. — Darlene Superville Trump's Tuesday schedule, according to the White House The president has no public events schedule for Tuesday, according to the White House. Amid Trump-Harvard dispute, Hong Kong seeks to enroll international students Hong Kong's leader John Lee said Tuesday the city would welcome any students who've been discriminated against by the U.S. policy, days after the Trump administrationrevoked Harvard University'sability to enroll international students. Last Friday, a U.S. federal judge blocked the U.S. government from cutting off Harvard'senrollment of foreign students, an action the Ivy League school decried as unconstitutional retaliation for defying the White House's political demands. Lee said in a weekly press briefing that the government and eight of the city's universities will do their best to assist any students who suffered from "discriminatory and unfair treatment" in finding a way to study in Hong Kong. He said if necessary, he would consider raising the enrollment quotas for non-local students in these universities. Trump targeted Democrats over questionable online fundraising. His campaign has similar issues When Trump directed his attorney general last month to investigate online fundraising, he cited concerns that foreigners and fraudsters were using elaborate "schemes" and "dummy accounts" to funnel illegal contributions to politicians and causes. Instead of calling for an expansive probe, however, the president identified just one potential target: ActBlue,the Democrats' online fundraising juggernaut,which has acknowledged receiving over 200 potentially illicit contributions last year from foreign internet addresses. Trump's announcement contained a glaring omission — his political committees also received scores of potentially problematic contributions. An Associated Press review of donations to Trump over the past five years found 1,600 contributions from donors who live abroad, have close ties to foreign interests or failed to disclose basic information, often making it difficult, if not impossible, to identify them and verify the legality of their donations. Among those was $5,000 linked to a derelict building, and $5,000 from a Chinese businessman who listed a La Quinta Inn as his address. Another sizable donation — $1 million — was made by the wife of an African oil and mining magnate. ▶ Read moreabout the AP's findings Here's what a Texas oil executive from DOGE is doing inside the Interior Department A Texas oil executive fromElon Musk'sgovernment efficiency teamhas been given sweeping powers to overhaul the federal department that manages vast tracts of resource-rich public lands, but he hasn't divested his energy investments or filed an ethics commitment to break ties with companies that pose a conflict of interest, records show. Interior SecretaryDoug Burgumrecently directed Tyler Hassen, who lacks Senate confirmation and has no public administration experience, to reorganize the Interior Department, which oversees some 70,000 employees in 11 agencies including the National Park Service, Bureau of Land Management, Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Geological Survey and the Bureau of Indian Affairs. Before joining DOGE, Hassen spent nearly two decades as an executive at Basin Holdings, an enterprise involved in the manufacture, sale and servicing of oil rigs worldwide. A financial disclosure report obtained by AP shows Hassen made millions annually from these companies, owned by John Fitzgibbons — an industry giant who is well-connected in Russia. ▶ Read moreabout Hassen Major headlines from the weekend Catching up on the news from the holiday weekend? Here are some of the headlines Trump honors fallen soldiers on Memorial Day, while attacking Biden and judges Trump paid tribute to fallen service members during aMemorial Day ceremonyat Arlington National Cemetery on Monday, in an address that honored the "great, great warriors" yet also briefly veered into politics as he boasted of a nation he is "fixing after a long and hard four years." Though the holiday is one that U.S. presidents typically treat with pure solemnity, Trump began it with an all-caps Memorial Day social media post that attacked his predecessor and calledfederal judges who have blockedhis deportation initiatives "monsters who want our country to go to hell." Yet at Arlington National Cemetery, where more than 400,000 have been laid to rest, Trump commemorated the sacrifice of U.S. service members and singled out several Gold Star families to tell the stories of their fallen relatives. ▶ Read moreabout Trump's Memorial Day speech

The Latest: Trump pays tribute to fallen soldiers in service at Arlington National Cemetery

The Latest: Trump pays tribute to fallen soldiers in service at Arlington National Cemetery President Donald Trumppaid tribute to fallen ser...

 

ISG POLITICS © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com