Saturday, May 24, 2025

Credibility crisis: When CNN criticized questioning Biden's mental fitnessNew Foto - Credibility crisis: When CNN criticized questioning Biden's mental fitness

A CNN anchor is the co-author of a buzzy new book that sheds light on PresidentJoe Biden's apparent mental decline in office and the cover-up orchestrated by his team, but various CNN figures were critical in the past of narratives that questioned his fitness. As Jake Tapper and co-author Alex Thompson promote "Original Sin," an account of the cover-up that features high-level Democratic sources, media critics have noted CNN and other mainstream outlets downplayed or were even hostile to the suggestion that Biden could be losing his grip before last year's debate against PresidentDonald Trump. Here are four examples at CNN. New Book Reveals Biden's Inner Circle Worried About His Age Years Before Botched Debate Performance Videos of Biden freezing upor appearing confused at various events went viral throughout 2024, but the White House aggressively pushed back, saying some of them were edited in a misleading fashion or didn't show what they purported. The term "cheap fakes" was popularized, andpress secretary Karine Jean-Pierrenoted from the podium that fact-checkers and mainstream outlets also embraced the term. Read On The Fox News App CNN White House correspondent Arlette Saenz pushed the White House's narrative last year about a video of Biden appearing to freeze up at a fundraiser with Jimmy Kimmel, saying Biden had merely "looked out at the crowd for a few seconds" before walking offstage withPresident Barack Obama, adding that "Republicans and right-leaning media outlets" "used this moment to say that President Biden froze." Moments later during a panel discussion, CNN commentator and formerKamala Harrisadviser Jamal Simmons called Biden's fundraiser moment an "obviously selected video." "These are cheap fakes, [as] the White House and Biden people are calling them," Simmons told CNN's Erin Burnett. Tapper feels differently about them. Jake Tapper Declares Biden White House Lied About 'Cheap Fakes' After Cnn Peddled Narrative In 2024 "The Biden White House falsely- when people showed that clip and asked what was going on- said it was a 'cheap fake.' They did this all the time when there was video that seemed to show Biden acting in an odd or unusual, seemingly out-of-it way, they would call it a 'cheap fake.' It was not fake. It was actual video," Tapper said last week. In a story in the aftermath of the Robert Hur report where Biden was memorably described as an elderly man with a poor memory, CNN's website published an article expressing concerns about both Biden and Trump and what type of cognitive ability was normal for a person in their 80s. The article cited a professor who said Biden's issues with word recall were not necessarily indicative of someone having memory issues. Biden at timesduring the interview with Hurhad difficulty remembering when he was vice president and the year of his son Beau's death in 2015. The article concludedwith the professor saying that ageism was codified in how people talk to one another, suggesting that the skepticism about Biden was a form of prejudice against the elderly. "Ageism is not just what people do to each other. Ageism is also a mindset that you carry within yourself," the professor said. "It actually impacts your health negatively." Jake Tapper's Past Coverage Of Biden's Cognitive Decline Under Scrutiny Ahead Of His New Book Ex-CNN media reporter Oliver Darcy repeatedly hammered proponents of the idea that Biden was in mental decline in his "Reliable Sources" newsletter before leaving CNN last year. "For years, and particularly over the last few months, MAGA Media has portrayed Biden as a senile, mentally incapacitated elderly man who cannot remember what he had for breakfast, let alone run the federal government," Darcy wrote in a newsletter last June, before the then-president's disastrous debate. Darcy declared the debate would give Biden an easy chance to "puncture the narrative" that he lacked fitness for office, suggesting Republicans had stupidly lowered the bar so much that Biden would easily clear it and come out of the debate stronger. "That's a worry for right-wing media figures, which risk seeing their bogus narrative about Biden being ripped up in real time," he wrote. Darcy also blasted the Wall Street Journal report last June about Biden's behind-the-scenes decline in his newsletter, saying it "owes its readers —and the public— better." Asked for comment byFox News Digitalabout his past coverage, Darcy, who left CNN last year to start his own newsletter called Status, pointed to his newsletter Wednesday where he declared conservative media outlets were taking an undeserved victory lap. Biden Insider Exposes How White House 'Gaslit' The Public About Former President's Decline "For years, right-wing media pushed a warped narrative of Joe Biden as a brain-dead puppet controlled by sinister, shadowy forces. Now they're demanding vindication—but they do not deserve it,"he wrote. Even after Biden dropped out of the race last July, "The View" co-host and CNN commentator Ana Navarro was committed to defending his mental acuity in office. Later that week, Manhattan Institute official Reihan Salam wondered if Biden should even stay in office until his term ended, but Navarro erupted that any talk about his state behind the scenes was mere speculation. "No, it is speculation! It is speculation! Because actually, unlike you, I've actually seen the guy at 9:00 at night. I have seen him after he has had five different events in 24 hours,"Navarro saidat one point. Navarro appeared to have a strong interest in Biden, beyond that of a typical media pundit. Although she continues to identify as a Republican, the left-wing commentator is an avid supporter of the Democratic Party, hosted the second night of the 2024 Democratic National Convention, and hasreferred to Biden and Harrisas "Uncle Joe" and "Auntie Kamala." CNN has stood behind Tapper's past reporting in light of his new job, pointing to examples when he aggressively covered the subject. For his part, however, Tapper hassaid he feels "humility"about his past work on Biden and praised conservative media outlets for discussing what was in plain sight. Fox News Digital's Joseph A. Wulfsohn contributed to this report. Original article source:Credibility crisis: When CNN criticized questioning Biden's mental fitness

Credibility crisis: When CNN criticized questioning Biden's mental fitness

Credibility crisis: When CNN criticized questioning Biden's mental fitness A CNN anchor is the co-author of a buzzy new book that sheds ...
McCaul touts money in Trump tax bill to pay Texas back for fighting Biden border policiesNew Foto - McCaul touts money in Trump tax bill to pay Texas back for fighting Biden border policies

There's a provision tucked into PresidentDonald Trump'sbroadly ranging "big, beautiful bill" that could see Texas get billions of dollars in funds that it spent on the state's border security under the Biden administration. The legislation earmarked $12 billion for a grant program allowing states to be reimbursed for costs they incurred trying to stem the flow of illegal immigration during the Democratic administration. The measure was added to the bill hours before the final vote – but Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Texas, the former chairman of the House Homeland Security and Foreign Affairs Committees, told Fox News Digital it was a product of months of negotiation. "Early on, [Homeland Security Committee Chair Mark Green, R-Tenn., and I were discussing reconciliation going through the Homeland Security Committee. And, you know, there was about $70 billion for the border," McCaul said. "Texas bore the brunt of the federal mission the last four years and deserves to be reimbursed. And so he agreed, had a conversation with Governor Abbott, and he agreed." House Gop Targets Another Dem Official Accused Of Blocking Ice Amid Delaney Hall Fallout While the text does not name Texas specifically, Fox News Digital was told that the measure's inclusion was primarily sought by the Lone Star state's congressional delegation. Read On The Fox News App The state of Texas, Fox News Digital was told, had incurred just over $11 billion in costs from Gov. Greg Abbott's efforts to keep the border in his state secure. "The fact of the matter is, when you look at the costs that were borne, Texas had the lion's share of [the burden] carrying out the federal mission when the Biden administration completely failed to deliver on border security," McCaul said. "My state built the border wall and built detention facilities. We bore a lot of costs." Operation Lone Star alone cost Texas $11.1 billion, according toThe Texas Tribune. Rather than add it to the initial text of the bill, McCaul said, leaders opted to include it in a "managers amendment" that was added on Wednesday night along with several other issues that lawmakers needed more time to negotiate. "The legislative process, it's something I've gotten to know over my 20 years and how to get things done up here. And I thought, you know, the way we worked it was strategically very smart," McCaul said. "It's going to the Senate now. And Senator Cornyn is going to take it up, be the champion in the Senate." The Texas Republican first met with Abbott and Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., on the matter in early February, Fox News Digital was told. McCaul said he also worked closely on the push with Republican Study Committee Chairman August Pfluger, R-Texas, who told Fox News Digital that "no state" carried more financial burden from the border crisis than Texas. "Texas spent $11.1 billion on border security, including $5.87 billion on personnel costs and $4.75 billion on border wall and barriers. When the federal government failed to secure our border and protect our communities, Texans stepped up," Pfluger said. Johnson, for his part, thanked McCaul for his efforts in a public written statement. "Thanks to Rep. McCaul, states that stepped up to protect Americans in the face of Biden'sborder catastrophewill be reimbursed for doing the work the Biden Administration refused to do," the speaker said. "Had those patriotic governors not taken action and used the resources of their state, the devastation from Biden's wide-open border would have been significantly worse." Meet The Trump-picked Lawmakers Giving Speaker Johnson A Full House Gop Conference Green said of the need for the measure, "In the absence of help from the Biden-Harris administration, states were forced to take extraordinary measures to mitigate the crisis and protect their communities by building barrier systems and increasing law enforcement activity." And while McCaul and his colleagues' efforts in the House do not guarantee that Texas will ultimately see those funds, it puts them one step closer to success. The measure is one aspect in a multi-trillion-dollar bill that Republicans are working to pass via the budget reconciliation process. By lowering the Senate's threshold for passage from 60 votes to 51, reconciliation enables the party in power to pass certain fiscal legislation while completely sidelining the minority – in this case, Democrats. Trump directed Republicans to use reconciliation to advance his policies on taxes, immigration, energy, defense, and the national debt. The Senate and House must pass identical versions of the bill before it gets to Trump's desk. McCaul told Fox News Digital that he was confident the measure would stay in the Senate bill after conversations with the Trump administration on the matter. "I anticipate it will go forward," McCaul said. "I'm, just proud that we were able to get this done. I'm very proud of what my state did to stop the flow of illegals and dangerous actors coming into the country." When reached for comment, Abbott told Fox News Digital, "This is a national issue that Texas was proud to address, and we are grateful for the allocation that reduces the financial burden that Texas incurred." Original article source:McCaul touts money in Trump tax bill to pay Texas back for fighting Biden border policies

McCaul touts money in Trump tax bill to pay Texas back for fighting Biden border policies

McCaul touts money in Trump tax bill to pay Texas back for fighting Biden border policies There's a provision tucked into PresidentDonal...
WATCH: Wall of Remembrance displayed as lawmakers commemorate Memorial DayNew Foto - WATCH: Wall of Remembrance displayed as lawmakers commemorate Memorial Day

(The Center Square) – The Memorial Day 2025 Wall of Remembrance is on display at the Illinois State Capitol in Springfield. Illinois Senate Republicans unveiled the tribute Thursday. The wall includes photos and remembrances that cycle on a large screen in the Capitol rotunda. State Sen. Jason Plummer, R-Edwardsville, served as an officer in the U.S. Navy Reserve. "This powerful tribute honors the brave men and women who have made the ultimate sacrifice in defense of our country," Plummer said. State Sen. Li Arellano, R-Dixon, is an Army Engineers staff sergeant in the U.S. Army Reserves. Arellano served on combat tours in the Middle East. "For me and for many soldiers, it's also about honoring and respecting the families who lost those veterans. As we commemorate Memorial Day, I ask you to join me in remembering and honoring our fallen brothers and sisters who gave everything so that we might live in freedom," Arellano said. State Sen. Craig Wilcox, R-McHenry, is a retired Air Force colonel. "We must remember it is not just a long weekend for the start of summer, but it is a sacred time to pause and to remember and to reflect on the cost of our freedom," Wilcox said. Wilcox spent 24 years in the U.S. Air Force and said he lost a member in the line of duty while he was a commander on active duty. He said the wall is a tribute to the brave men and women who gave their lives in sacrifice to the nation. "As we stand in the presence of their memory, let us recommit ourselves to living lives worthy of their sacrifice," Wilcox said. Illinoisans were encouraged to submit photos and written remembrances in honor of those who died in service to their state and country. The public is also invited to leave a personal message of thanks at the tribute display. The Wall of Remembrance is open to the public during regular Capitol business hours and is scheduled to remain on display through June.

WATCH: Wall of Remembrance displayed as lawmakers commemorate Memorial Day

WATCH: Wall of Remembrance displayed as lawmakers commemorate Memorial Day (The Center Square) – The Memorial Day 2025 Wall of Remembrance i...
Trump's Issue With the E.U. as He Threatens 50% TariffNew Foto - Trump's Issue With the E.U. as He Threatens 50% Tariff

President Donald Trump speaks at a ceremony in the Oval Office of the White House on May 19, 2025, in Washington, D.C. Credit - Chip Somodevilla—Getty Images In a sharp escalation of trade negotiations with the European Union (E.U.),Trump took to social media on Fridayand announced that he is "recommending a straight 50% tariff on the European Union, starting on June 1, 2025." "The European Union, which was formed for the primary purpose of taking advantage of the United States on TRADE, has been very difficult to deal with," Trump claimed. "Their powerful trade barriers, VAT taxes, ridiculous corporate penalties, non-monetary trade barriers, monetary manipulations, unfair and unjustified lawsuits against Americans companies, and more, have led to a trade deficit with the U.S. of more than $250,000,000 a year, a number which is totally unacceptable. Our discussions with them are going nowhere!" As he has said elsewhere, Trump went on to add: "There is no tariff if the product is built or manufactured in the United States." Trump's initial April 2 "Liberation Day" tariffs included a blanket 10% tariff on nations doing business with the U.S., plus additional"reciprocal" tariffsfor some. The E.U. was hit with a 20% reciprocal tariff. In response, Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Commission, the E.U.'s executive armissued a strong statement, calling the move "a blow to the world economy," and vowing that the E.U. would issue countermeasures. "We are in this together. If you take on one of us, you take on all of us. Europe stands together for our businesses, for our workers and for all Europeans," she said, before highlighting her eagerness to move from "confrontation to negotiation." The E.U.voted to retaliate on some of Trump's tariffs, but such discussions were halted when Trump announced a 90-day pause on most "reciprocal" charges. The E.U. therefore currently only has a 10% tariff from the U.S. While the 90-day pause, set to expire on July 9, has offered the E.U. a reprieve, Trump's threat to enforce a 50% tariff starting June 1 has once again spiked tensions and themarkets have responded negatively. Some hours after Trump's announcement on Friday, Maroš Šefčovič, Commissioner for Trade and Economic Security at the E.U.,posted on Xthat he had engaged in discussions with Trump's Secretary of Commerce, Howard Lutnick, and the U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer."The E.U.'s fully engaged, committed to securing a deal that works for both. E.U. remains ready to work in good faith," Šefčovič said, before reiterating the E.U.'s stance that negotiation is preferred over confrontation. "E.U.-U.S. trade is unmatched and must be guided by mutual respect, not threats."However, amid fears of a U.S.-E.U. trade war, Šefčovič concluded on a defiant note: "We stand ready to defend our interests." The E.U. is one of Washington's top commercial partners, and is thelargest trading blocin the world. Later in the Oval Office on Friday, Trump defended his announcement, complaining about the E.U.'s business dealings and citing the U.S. goods trade deficit with the E.U., which was $235.6 billion in 2024, according toU.S. Commerce Department data. "I'm not looking for a deal," Trumptold reporters."We've set the deal—it's at 50%." Trump's tariff threat comes after years of him highlighting dissatisfaction with trade between the U.S. and the E.U. During his first term, Trump imposedtariffson steel and aluminium imports from the E.U., Canada, and Mexico, which at the time brought the U.S. to the brink of a trade war. In 2018,when asked about the tariffs,Trump said that "nobody treats us much worse than the European Union" and argued the bloc was "formed" to "take advantage of" the U.S. During the first few months of Trump's second term in the White House, tensions have grown, both as a result of his tumultuous trade policies and hisgeopolitical movesin regards to the Russia-Ukraine war. Meanwhile, outside of the E.U., Trump has had some success with his trade deals. Trump saidon Truth Socialon Friday that the U.S. dealings with the United Kingdom are "working out well for all." This comes after the U.S. and the U.K. announced a trade agreement on May 8, one which Trump hailed for its "reciprocity and fairness." Progress was made between the U.S. and Chinaearlier this month when both nations agreed to drastically reduce tariffs on each other for an initial 90-day period, which came into effect on May 14. Contact usatletters@time.com.

Trump's Issue With the E.U. as He Threatens 50% Tariff

Trump's Issue With the E.U. as He Threatens 50% Tariff President Donald Trump speaks at a ceremony in the Oval Office of the White House...
US-Iran latest nuclear talks end with limited progress, as Tehran sources express skepticismNew Foto - US-Iran latest nuclear talks end with limited progress, as Tehran sources express skepticism

Iran and the United States concluded a fifth round ofhigh-stakes nuclear talksin Rome on Friday amid growing skepticism in Tehran about the chances of a deal as Washington hardens its position. A senior Trump administration official said Friday more talks are needed and both sides agreed to meet "in the near future." "The talks continue to be constructive – we made further progress," the official said, "but there is still work to be done." The US side said the discussions, which was attended by Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff, lasted more than two hours. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Friday's nuclear talks with the US "are too complicated to be resolved in two or three meetings." He said however that Iran and US delegations "have completed one of the most professional rounds of negotiations," in a televised interview on state-run IRIB news. Two Iranian sources have told CNN the talks seem unlikely to lead to an agreement, with the US insisting that Tehran dismantles its uranium enrichment program – a demand Iranian officials say wouldcause the nuclear negotiations to collapse. The sources said Iran's participation in the Rome talks was solely to gauge Washington's latest stance rather than pursue a potential breakthrough. Araghchi reiterated Tehran's red lines before he departed for Rome on Friday. "Figuring out the path to a deal is not rocket science," he posted on X before his flight. "Zero nuclear weapons = we DO have a deal. Zero enrichment = we do NOT have a deal." The Trump administration has demanded Iran stop all uranium enrichment activity, whichWitkoffsays "enables weaponization." Uranium, a key nuclear fuel, can be used to build a bomb if enriched to high levels. Iran maintains that its nuclear program is peaceful and says it is willing to commit not to enrich uranium to weapons-grade as part of an agreement. Araghchi met on Friday with Omani Foreign Minister Badr al-Busaidi in Rome "during the continuation of this round of talks," and the two ministers "reviewed the latest status of today's talks and consulted on how to continue the work," Iran's foreign ministry said in a statement. "The time and place of the next round of talks will be determined and announced later," the statement added. US officials have yet to comment publicly on the outcome of Friday's talks. Al-Busaidi, who mediated the talks, said, "We hope to clarify the remaining issues in the coming days, to allow us to proceed towards the common goal of reaching a sustainable and honourable agreement," in a post on X on Friday. On Saturday, a senior Iranian lawmaker told CNN that Tehran is disappointed with the progress of nuclear talks and is considering a "Plan B" if they fail – though he did not specify what it would entail. "We do not have hope yet, because the American side is still insisting on zero enrichment and I know the Islamic Republic of Iran will never agree with zero enrichment," Ebrahim Rezaei, a member of the parliament's National Security and Foreign Policy Committee, said in an interview at the Iranian parliament Saturday. "I got disappointed and do not have much hope that the negotiations will lead to a deal. We are preparing for plan B." Rezaei said it was too early to judge whether the talks could succeed. "So far we have not seen much seriousness on their (US') part," he added. Speaking Thursday, Araghchi said Iran was open to enhanced monitoring by international inspectors but would not relinquish its right to pursue nuclear energy, including uranium enrichment. Washington is offering to wind back crippling economic sanctions on Iran in exchange for de-nuclearization. The US had previouslysent mixed signalsabout whether Iran would be allowed to enrich uranium, but in recent weeks it has hardened its stance, insisting that no enrichment will be permitted. That shift has prompted officials in Tehran to question Washington's commitment to a deal, as Iran has repeatedly said enrichment is a red line in negotiations. The two Iranian sources told CNN that Tehran harbors mounting doubts about the US' sincerity in talks. "The media statements and negotiating behavior of the United States has widely disappointed policy-making circles in Tehran," the sources said in a joint message. "From the perspective of decision-makers in Tehran, when the US knows that accepting zero enrichment in Iran is impossible and yet insists on it, it is a sign that the US is fundamentally not seeking an agreement and is using the negotiations as a tool to intensify pressure." Initially, the sources noted, some Iranian officials believed Washington might seek a "win-win" compromise. However, a consensus has emerged that the Trump administration is steering discussions toward a deadlock. The sources said that although neither the US nor Iran wants to leave the negotiating table, the position of the US is making the talks unproductive and formal meetings are unlikely to continue much longer. They said that Tehran no longer takes seriously US efforts to distance itself from Israel's hardline stance on Iran, and it sees proposals made by the American side as following the agenda of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has insisted that no enrichment be allowed in Iran. Witkoff on Friday met with Ron Dermer, a confidant of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in Rome on the sidelines of talks, a source familiar with the meeting told CNN. Washington has kept up the pressure on Iran with fresh sanctions and threats of war even as diplomatic talks continue. On Wednesday, the US State Department announced new measures, identifying Iran's construction sector as being "controlled directly or indirectly" by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and 10 strategic materials that it said Iran is using in connection with its nuclear, military or ballistic missile programs. "With these determinations, the United States has broader sanctions authorities to prevent Iran from acquiring strategic materials for its construction sector under IRGC control and its proliferation programs," State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said. Iran's foreign ministry spokesperson criticized US Secretary of State Marco Rubio for the move, calling it "as outrageous as it is unlawful and inhuman." "The US's consecutive rounds of sanctions only reinforce our people's deeply held belief that the American decision makers are set to make every malign effort to hinder Iran's development & progress. These sanctions, announced on the eve of the fifth round of Iran-US indirect talks, further put to question the American willingness & seriousness for diplomacy," Baqaei wrote on X. Ali Vaez, Iran project director at the International Crisis Group in Brussels, said there is a misguided perception in Washington that a weakened Iran is more likely to compromise. "The weaker Iran is, the more reluctant it will be to make major concessions," he said, adding that it is unlikely that Tehran will agree to a deal that is based solely on US terms. "That's a complete misreading of Iranian psychology," Vaez said. For Iran, capitulation is seen as a worse than an Israeli strike on its nuclear facilities, he added. "Iran would be reluctant to make concessions from a position of weakness, because if it does so, then it will put itself on a slippery slope that could result in regime collapse," Vaez said. Multiple American officialstold CNN this weekthat the US has obtained new intelligence suggesting that Israel is preparing to strike Iranian nuclear facilities even as the Trump administration pursues a diplomatic deal with Tehran. But threats of war will only lead to Iran "doubling down on its current position," Sanam Vakil, director of the Middle East and North Africa Programme at London's Chatham House think tank, told CNN. "The best way to invigorate the talks would be through backchannelling and quiet discussions between both sides." In an interview with CNN's Jim Sciutto on Thursday, US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee signaled potential American support for Israel's nuclear plans under the right conditions. "I can't imagine the US would object to a sovereign nation defending itself against what they perceive as a legitimate threat to their very lives," Huckabee said. He acknowledged that the US is aware Israel is making preparations for potential military action. "We certainly are aware of what the Israelis are at least preparing for. But it's not that they have made a firm decision. I think they recognize they face an existential threat from Iran." Experts say an Israeli attack on Iranian nuclear facilities would likely spell the end of its negotiations with the US, and could even prompt Tehran to withdraw from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), which promotes nuclear disarmament. Trita Parsi, executive vice president of the Quincy Institute in Washington, DC, said the Trump administration has "unnecessarily walked themselves into a dead-end by insisting on zero enrichment," fueling the idea that Israeli strikes will follow if Iran doesn't back down. Iran, he added, is probably not taking those threats seriously. But if they do materialize in the midst of nuclear talks with the US, he said, Tehran is likely to respond with massive retaliation. "They won't play the patience game any longer," Parsi said. "If the Israelis were to do anything, it has to be clearly understood that it is not about destroying the program at this point, because they don't have that capability." Parsi added. "It is only about destroying diplomacy." This story has been updated with additional developments. CNN's Nadeen Ebrahim, Angus Watson, Mostafa Salem, Alex Marquardt , Kylie Atwood ,Katrina Samaan and Leila Gharagozlou contributed to this report. For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

US-Iran latest nuclear talks end with limited progress, as Tehran sources express skepticism

US-Iran latest nuclear talks end with limited progress, as Tehran sources express skepticism Iran and the United States concluded a fifth ro...

 

ISG POLITICS © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com